Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2024: NEW MEDIA ADDED!
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner TABLE for TEN Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 2024 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2024
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2024
    • ARCHIVE: GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

BLOG

4 Comments

Author’s Note

Peter Pavia
life's tragedy, Truth, writing
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

Years ago, I made the acquaintance of a man who wrote on occasion. Beyond the ambition of the Big Score that busted-out writers and horse players dream of, he had none. His main occupation at that time was swilling vodka, browbeating his fellow barflies, and bemoaning what might have been. Then, toward the end of the evening, or more accurately, the approaching dawn, he would begin to rhapsodize about the Brooklyn Dodgers he had worshipped as a boy.

His main obstacles besides the booze: He had inhaled too dangerously the acrid aroma of minor Hollywood success. But worse, an “inheritance” idled in his background, an inheritance, alas, not bound by the ancient tradition of primogeniture: It went to his father’s second wife and her children, and, since he was not one of them, his total haul from the will, after probate, amounted to next to nothing.

And then, amid the hurly-burly of the vodka swilling and the rhapsodizing, an ill wind lifted a literary opportunity over his transom, a story of nearness to riches and fame that featured one of the 20th-century’s cultural icons, about whom he knew little and cared less; but the Hollywood olfactory was reactivated, and he made a deal to write the book. A movie would be sure to follow, or even, God and the right sort of powerhouse connections willing, precede its publication.

Heady, heady days indeed.

The man devoted the next decade, ten full years, or one-eighth of a generous expectancy of life on this planet, to creating something for which he had almost no affinity. In a career distinguished by losing photo finishes and awful choices, I consider this squandering of time and talent to be the main tragedy of his life. He may see it differently. I don’t know. He is elderly now, and much diminished. I haven’t talked to him in a long time. I’m going to call him today, and I’m not going to ask about the book. Because, in the end, the bemoaning of things that might have been found a permanent home in the failure of this project (and the 23-year-old Oberlin graduates who had understandably stopped taking his calls at the skid row publisher that brought it out).

The book isn’t terrible. Really. It did what almost all books of its kind do, that is, attracted a certain amount of publicity due to the reeking fame of its subject, in whom, all these years later, interest remains high. The publication of same earned the man a minor sum, which was not earmarked for escapes to Capri or the foundation of a real estate empire; no, the money went to creditors who were dunning him for what he owed, and he was able to send them enough so that the amount would shut them up for at least a month.

Please don’t think the purpose of this anecdote is to suggest that the successful man learns from the mistakes of others, although that is true. I haven’t done much better than this guy, if at all, but I have drawn my lessons as I sat elbow to crooked elbow with this sad figure, lessons it took me far too long to apprehend.

The most gruesome cliché in the writing racket is “write about what you know.” Like all cliches this one is rooted in truth. Witness the avalanche of tepid memoirs that publishing companies churn out by the dozens, heartrending tales of overcoming adversity: the Myanmarese slave who sloughs off his thrall, graduates from Stanford, and lands a juicy gig at some Wall Street shop. Now that, my friends, is a Big Score. But note how little this has to do with writing, even though these authors were surely writing about what they knew, or what they thought they knew: themselves.

That which is not known, that is, if we’re not talking about nuclear physics, or the composition of a symphony, can be learned in a relatively short period of time. Whether or not you’ve developed any feel for what you’ve learned, any touch, well, I’m afraid that’s anyone’s guess.

And so, the moral of the story appears to be this: Write about what you love. I love life, although it demands an unearthly amount of perseverance and courage to live abundantly. I love people and I love families. That’s what I’m going to write about. And I’m going to write about horse racing because the sport, and the game—they are distinct—have consumed far too much of my attention, too exorbitant a number of hours, to justify not writing about it, despite the breakdowns, the drugged animals, the near misses, the wagers that finish in the back of the pack. I looked on in horror as a first-time starter, a 3-year-old filly I bet, was euthanized near the starting gate.

The turf analyst and bettor Andrew Beyer, whose sardonic realism is an antidote to my dreamy romanticism (the horses are my Brooklyn Dodgers) and whose sorely needed influence can be detected in my thinking, put it most poetically—I mean, for a hard-nosed gambler. Amid an especially nasty losing streak, Beyer was forced to confront the reason he returned again and again to the racetrack. Perhaps at a loss for words, he reached out for a line attributed to another 20th-century icon, George Patton, who may or may not have said what the movie quoted him as saying, but it’s good enough for me. Recalling George C. Scott’s portrayal in the award-winning biopic, as the general wades through a battlefield strewn with his dead and wounded soldiers, he intones these ominous words: “I love it. God help me, but I do love it so.”

 

224 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Peter Pavia

—Peter Pavia is the author of The Cuba Project and Dutch Uncle, a novel. His work has appeared in the New York Times, GQ, Diner Journal, and many other publications.

Social Share

  • google-share

4 Comments

  1. fenton lawless July 25, 2023 at 2:19 pm Reply

    Always interesting, illuminating and comfortable in the best sense of the word.
    Well done Mr Pavia.
    fenton lawless

    • Peter J Pavia July 25, 2023 at 6:41 pm Reply

      Thanks, Fenton. Always.

  2. Cynthia Peck July 25, 2023 at 7:10 pm Reply

    As always Peter I so enjoy reading your writings, musings, lessons learned, etc. gives much to think on……Cynthia P

    • Peter J Pavia July 27, 2023 at 7:44 am Reply

      Very generous of you. Thanks. Keep reading. Keep thinking and keep praying.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

IVF: The Frozen Sleep Evading Time

07 May 2025

Report: "The Abortion Pill Harms Women"

05 May 2025

New York Pushes Asissted Suicide

30 Apr 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.