Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2024: NEW MEDIA ADDED!
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner TABLE for TEN Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 2024 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2024
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2024
    • ARCHIVE: GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

BLOG

2 Comments

Who Are the Barbarians?

Diane Moriarty
abortion rights rhetoric, barbaric acts
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

Mumbley Peg was a very popular game in 19th-century America, equal to marbles and jacks. In Mark Twain’s 1896 novel Tom Sawyer, Detective, mumbley peg, or “mumblety-peg,” was described as a favorite game of young boys. In it two opponents stand opposite each other with their feet shoulder-width apart, then the first player takes his pocket knife and throws it at the ground, sticking it as close as possible to his own foot. The second player does the same with his own knife. The player who sticks his knife closest to his foot wins. The winner then drives a wooden peg into the ground and the loser must pull it out with his teeth while mumbling curses at the winner, hence “mumbley peg.” But there’s another version, presumably for adults (and very bored adults at that), where one can score an automatic win by purposely sticking the knife into your own foot! Throwing the knife as close to your own foot without actually hitting it takes skill and nerve, but an intentionally self-inflicted wound as a fast track to success? Two things immediately spring to mind: How much moonshine was consumed before the concept and ground rules for this sport were thunk up, and um, what’s the point? But as I was chortling to myself over the rank stupidity of this pastime, my head snapped back with the sudden realization that it bears a close resemblance to modern rhetoric about abortion “rights.”

To be sure, the only thing modern about abortion is today’s rhetoric. The practice goes back thousands of years and was most often done with herbal mixtures. Abortion wasn’t discouraged in ancient Greece and Rome, although, according to Wikipedia, a fragment of a poem attributed to Lysias suggests it could have been a crime for a pregnant woman to abort if her husband died before she gave birth, depriving the unborn child of his inheritance. In terms of attitudes, the Stoics, for instance, who believed in practicing virtue and living in accordance with nature, found abortion morally acceptable because they believed the fetus to be plantlike and didn’t assume an animal nature until birth. Elective abortion in the Middle Ages was mostly the province of mid-wives and primarily for women facing “misfortune,” but there were also “partial-birth abortions” using surgical means to save the life of the mother.

Generally, people from ancient times and on through the Middle Ages were accepting of barbarity, be it cheering as Christians were eaten alive by wild animals in the arena or penalties like burning at the stake and drawing and quartering. But needless to say, abortion wasn’t a multi-million-dollar industry as it is today, lauded as being a path to supposed “feminist” empowerment. Nor could the people who lived back then watch a sonogram of a 13-week-old fetus backing away from a needle before getting sucked into a vat. We can. So, who are the barbarians?

Recently, following five hours of at times melodramatic testimony from the pro-abortion public, a Florida State Senate committee advanced a bill to ban abortions at six weeks and give $25 million to pregnancy help centers. (The bill was signed into law by Governor Ron DeSantis on April 13.) An anesthesiologist, Dr. Nancy Staats, using an unintentionally comical visual aid, waved a Tic Tac around in front of the state senators to demonstrate the size of what she said the committee would “privilege over breathing patients”—the “patients” being healthy women choosing elective abortion. She went on: “At six weeks, a human fetus is about half the size of this Tic Tac, four millimeters high. It does not have a face . . . There is no heart, there is [sic] no lungs, there is no brain. It doesn’t have toes. It looks more like a tadpole.” As rhetorical exercise goes, this is throwing a knife into your own foot and claiming victory. If their issue is at what stage of development life in the womb is at when it may be destroyed, then they would embrace a ban at 13 weeks, when the fetus not only has a face, fingers and toes but the instinct to recoil from a suction needle; at 15 weeks, when it’s about to start kicking; at 20 weeks, when it’s two weeks or less away from being able to survive with NICU intervention. So, who’s kidding who? Who’s been hitting the moonshine?

All the talk about abortion being necessary for women to advance in society through career achievement and earning power, or exploiting the emotionally volatile subject of rape, is just rhetoric the politicians can run with when supporting popular pro-abortion legislation, or thwarting unpopular pro-life measures. There are better ways of furthering women’s interests once the resolve is there. Let’s face it, admitting outright that the real need for abortion is so people can hook up without consequence doesn’t have a great ring to it. And any woman who believes the men throwing chairs at pro-life gatherings are doing it to support equal rights for women is a fool.

Another popular justification for abortion is that it’s an answer to overpopulation. Population growth is a legitimate social concern. There were times in history when every birth was championed because so many offspring died in childhood, and disease and war took so many adults. For decades, however, some have worried that the planet will get so crowded it won’t be able to sustain population growth. Mass starvation was the theme in the late ’60s but it didn’t happen because of huge advances in agricultural science and standard-of-living improvements. Now the focus is on depleting natural resources, but the same human ingenuity that averted famine can be brought to bear here. What’s depressing is the headlong rush to resolve these issues by, essentially, culling the herd. To meekly consent to the idea that animal husbandry methods are appropriate for human beings. The so-called abortion right is a self-inflicted wound posing as a fast track to success. It’s bad mumbley peg.

 

345 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Diane Moriarty

Diane Moriarty is a free-lance writer living in Manhattan.  She previously wrote an art review column for Able Newspaper as well as articles outside the column. At the close of the last century DISH!, an independent film she wrote, produced, and directed was given a run at Anthology Film Archives by Jonas Mekus.

Social Share

  • google-share

2 Comments

  1. Ken Fye April 28, 2023 at 10:44 am Reply

    The ancients didn’t limit themselves to herbal abortifacients, although pennyroyal (mentioned by Aristophanes) was very popular. They also performed surgical abortion, without, of course, any knowledge of cleanliness or sterility; or anesthetics. Aulas Cornelius Celsus described it in De Medicina. The abortionists would inset his greased and unwashed hand (sometimes both hands) into the uterus to extract the dead baby after killing it with a long iron needle. The woman was lucky to survive. Celsus noted the procedure was “among the most difficult; for it requires both extreme caution and neatness, and entails very great risk.” Not to mention a patient’s vigorous “strength of mind”.

    Roman abortions weren’t a woman’s “right”; they were authorized exclusively (sometimes compelled) by her husband. There was indeed a law that forbade abortion without the husband’s consent because it would deprive him of his children.

    Modern barbarians haven’t come up with a new ethic. They’ve just remembered something very old.

  2. Diane Moriarty May 2, 2023 at 4:12 pm Reply

    Dear Mr. Fye,

    Thank you for commenting. Yes, there were also surgical abortions in ancient times but my research indicated it was uncommon, so I went with the herbal method which was most common.
    As I read you, I wondered if your graphic description of “greased and unwashed hand (sometimes both hands)” during ancient surgical abortions and “The woman was lucky to survive” and “Celsus noted the procedure was ‘among the most difficult; for it requires both extreme caution and neatness, and entails very great risk.’ might be your lead in for voicing support for the pro-choice “safe and legal” motto of today (but not rare anymore BTW, that was ditched).
    Maybe surgical abortions in Rome were only authorized, or even compelled, by the man, but home made herbal methods wouldn’t be. And with your stressing that (surgical) abortion wasn’t a “right” but something imposed upon her are you, in oblique fashion, voicing support for the “My Body My Choice” mantra?
    Are the “modern barbarians” you refer to pro-lifers, who by defending the unborn are, in your opinion, standing in the way of “safe and legal” abortions?
    There is indeed a new ethic regarding abortion. Whatever the failings of the ancients, they didn’t turn abortion into a multi million dollar a year lucrative industry.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

Israeli Supreme Court Minimizes Biological Parenthood

22 May 2025

Pro-life Groups Can’t be Forced to Accommodate Abortions, Federal Judge Rules

14 May 2025

Yonkers Woman Learns Abortion is Not the ‘Quick Fix’ She Thought 

12 May 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.