Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Summer 2025
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2025
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2025
    • Great Defender of Life Dinner TABLE for TEN 2025
    • Great Defender of Life Dinner Ticket 2025
    • Great Defender of Life 2025 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2025
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

BLOG

0 Comment

God Is Not Stingy

Dr. Donald DeMarco
choice v reason, God's abundance
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

A certain Catholic nun, whose name we need not divulge, has drawn upon theology to buttress her pro-choice philosophy. She argues that since God gave her the gift of choosing, she should use that gift. Therefore, in being pro-choice, she is cooperating with God.

God, however, is not stingy. He has not only given this nun the ability to choose, but also the gift of reason to ensure that she uses her power of choice properly. Sister has ignored God’s second gift, which complements the first. Why she has seen fit to ignore this second gift is a conundrum. No doubt, her daily life consists of innumerable acts of blending choice with reason. She does not suspend reason when she dresses, or when she dines. Why, then, does she ignore this universal human faculty when it comes to abortion? This is by no means easy to explain. Perhaps it has something to do with her desire to conform to the short-sightedness of the world. Yet, if she gratefully accepts the power of choosing, why does she not also accept the power of reasoning? She is selling God short.

Thomas Jefferson could not have afforded to make such an egregious mistake. The author of the Declaration of Independence, he was a statesman, a diplomat, and a lawyer. He was also America’s third president. But as he noted in his epitaph, he was most proud of being the Father of the University of Virginia. His philosophy of education is one that could serve us well in a time when coherent philosophies desert us: “This institution,” he stated, “will be based on the illimitable freedom of the human mind. For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate error so long as reason is left to combat it.”

The notion that the freedom of the human mind is illimitable would be happily endorsed in our pro-choice culture. But Jefferson does not stop there. He points out that education is the pursuit of truth wherever it leads. At this juncture the present culture would object. Who knows what constitutes truth? Such an assertion is arrogant! We know that truth leads to many unpleasant things. There are certain instances when stating the truth qualifies for “hate speech.” Therefore, let us replace the pursuit of truth with political correctness.

The essential meaning of education, nonetheless, is to seek, find, and implement the truth.  This is nothing more than being realistic. A university education benefits a student by helping him gain a better understanding of the truth of things. A systematic presentation of lies, deceits, and distortions would be of no use to him. In fact, it would be exceedingly harmful.  Consequently, Jefferson implements reason as a way of separating truth from error. His statement concerning the university he established is sound, sane, and sensible. Jefferson was not merely pro-choice, but pro-education. Would that we could follow in his footsteps.

“Pro-choice” is  a single, isolated idea that exemplifies what we might refer to as a “laziness of the mind,” a reluctance to continue one’s thought process until it has reached a sensible conclusion. The mind is not properly exercised when it jumps to conclusion or leaps to resolutions. The path to a proper conclusion is illuminated by reason. In the world of jurisprudence, a “rush to judgment” is considered a miscarriage of justice.

We need not fear errors, Jefferson wisely stated, as long as we have reason to combat them. In this regard, reason defeats errors before they have a chance to harm us. It is, we might say, an intellectual immune system that protects us from the confusion that errors can cause. “A sane mind in a strong body” (mens sana in corpore sano) is a timeless idea that highlights the interconnectedness of the mind and the body as well as the unity of the human person.

People can be enamored with choice. But they should be equally enamored with truth and reason. Thinking is not selecting your favorite stage and ignoring the rest. It is a careful integration of all the relevant parts. The basic problem with the pro-choice stance is that it is not so much wrong as incomplete. There is a critical element that is missing. Mahatma Ghandi applied the notion that some important element is missing to what he called the seven sins of the modern world: “Wealth without work, pleasure without conscience, knowledge without character, commerce without morality, science without humanity, worship without sacrifice, and politics without principle.”

God has been generous to us. He has given us the ability to choose and the capacity to employ reason in determining what we should choose and what we should avoid. He has also given us the ability to correct ourselves when we have gone astray. He has offered us truth. In addition, He has given us the likes of Thomas Jefferson . . . and Lincoln and Abraham and Aristotle and Plato and St. Thomas Aquinas.  Let us drink deeply from His cup of treasures.

 

23 people have visited this page. 10 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Dr. Donald DeMarco

Dr. Donald DeMarco is Prof. Emeritus/St. Jerome’s University and Adjunct Professor at Holy Apostles College & Seminary. He is a regular columnist for the St. Austin Review.  His latest book, The 12 Supporting Pillars of the Culture of Life and Why They Are Crumbling, is posted on amazon.com.

Social Share

  • google-share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

Robotic IVF: Technologically Impressive or Morally Problematic?

14 Nov 2025

What the 2025 Elections Mean for Pro-Lifers

06 Nov 2025

Pro-life Voters More Motivated Than Pro-Abortion Ones, Poll Finds

30 Oct 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Clarke D. Forsythe Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Julia Duin Kristan Hawkins Laura Echevarria Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.