Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2024: NEW MEDIA ADDED!
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner TABLE for TEN Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 2024 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2024
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2024
    • ARCHIVE: GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

BLOG

0 Comment

Web of Lies

Diane Moriarty
electoral system, political ambition, spinning lies
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

The preposterous idea that someone too senile to be a candidate is none-the-less fit to serve as president (have your 25th Amendment and eat it too) is a building block in the Democratic Party’s new Lego–like creation—an American electoral system engineered to fit their own needs. Another interlocking piece is a vice president, constitutionally purposed to take office if the president dies or becomes incapacitated, repurposed to take over a candidacy when the candidate’s incapacitation can no longer be hidden from the public.

Expanded early and mail-in voting, and all the security issues that come with it, was introduced into the 2020 election by Democrats as a temporary measure in response to COVID 19, the promise being it would be retired once the crisis was over. They lied. (Come to think of it they lied about much of the “crisis” too.) The Republicans said they were aghast. They lied. Once they saw the edge mail-in voting gave Democratic candidates, they jumped on board.

Will this new Lego-built electoral system, with its presidential candidate no one pulled a lever for and its ballooning ballot harvesting, become the new normal?

With the advent of the 2016 presidential campaign season liberal politicians told people that to call someone who entered the country illegally an illegal immigrant was insensitive and racist. They lied. America has always had an immigration policy to ensure orderly arrival. In the past there have been immigration pauses authorized for the commonsense purpose of allowing a recent influx to settle in and adapt, and the social systems along with them, before permitting the next wave. It’s basic math. The Emma Lazarus inscription in the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty (“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free . . .”) is immigration poetry, not immigration policy. Even so, American immigration policy had always allowed special consideration for a reasonable amount of asylum seekers. But in 2016 that poem was repurposed as an “American values” virtue-signaling Democratic campaign strategy. Now illegals, or as Bernie Sanders anointed them, “aspiring Americans,” have marched by the millions up through Central America and Mexico to cross our border. Their treks took months. The practical aspects of basic needs being met while walking all that way has never been fully explained. Somehow they were fed. Acts of charity can explain that, but a more glaring unanswered question is: How did they go to the bathroom? How does an army on the march go to the bathroom? Soldiers are assigned latrine duty. We’ve been led to believe this mass march was spontaneous, yet clearly there was planning, and some of it closely resembles the military principles involved in mass troop movements. Call it a soft invasion?

We’ve been assured that biology is baloney; that simply thinking you’re the opposite gender is so valid and binding it affords the inalienable right to access that gender’s locker rooms and facilities, join their athletic teams and commandeer their competitions. And just to make sure everyone takes it very seriously, pandering governors order tampon dispensers be put in the boys’ room at school so that biologically female students convinced they are male students can cope with the pesky reality check of menstruation while ignoring it at the same time. It’s all a lie. And that’s not even the worst of it. At an age when newly released hormones are surging through pubescent bodies, and brains, and it’s normal to feel awkward because of the rapid changes taking place, monsters in white coats carving out a lucrative niche in their made-up field of medicine lure these children into the sex-change industrial complex and mutilate them for life— while lying to us that they are saving them from suicidal thoughts that they helped put in their young heads in the first place.

They call it “gender affirming care,” but that’s a lie. It’s eugenics-era-style sterilization. (Forced sterilization policies in the US targeted minorities and those with disabilities – and lasted into the 21st century (theconversation.com) Poor black, white, and indigenous communities were targeted, with state-sanctioned sterilizations reaching their peak in the 1930s and 1940s; in some states, numbers even rose during the 1950s and 1960s. At first overseen by state eugenics boards, in the 1960s and 1970s federal programs like Medicaid also started funding nonconsensual sterilizations. Modern sex-change mania is, however, “voluntary and consented to” because it has been popularized by the media—including stories in magazines aimed at the teenage market—and canonized when the current (somewhat) POTUS proudly brayed at a State of the Union speech “I have your back” to “trans youth.” Not surprisingly Planned Parenthood is now haunting college campuses with this grotesque new commercial venture. Makes sense. There’s no surer form of birth control than amputating penises and atrophying wombs with infusions of male hormones in the name of “trans identity.” Gender affirming care is eugenic sterilization with a bow on it.

Political ambition is a force all its own. We’ll just have to wait and see if this surreal new electoral system conceived contra liberty and dedicated to spinning lies has staying power. But my gut tells me the guilt-tripping clichés about “aspiring Americans” that prompted the throwing open of our borders (for votes) and the phony “trans” science funded by suicide ultimatums have run their course in American society. It happened in that quiet yet unmistakable moment in the dark when your face realizes you just walked into a cobweb.

 

161 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Diane Moriarty

Diane Moriarty is a free-lance writer living in Manhattan.  She previously wrote an art review column for Able Newspaper as well as articles outside the column. At the close of the last century DISH!, an independent film she wrote, produced, and directed was given a run at Anthology Film Archives by Jonas Mekus.

Social Share

  • google-share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

RFK Jr, Autism, Eugenics--and Pro-Life Silence?

09 May 2025

IVF: The Frozen Sleep Evading Time

07 May 2025

Report: "The Abortion Pill Harms Women"

05 May 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.