Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2024: NEW MEDIA ADDED!
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner TABLE for TEN Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 2024 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2024
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2024
    • ARCHIVE: GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

NEWSworthy

3 Comments

Abortion Advocates Are Losing the Race to Replace Roe

Edward Mechmann
abortion advocates, Roe/Casey, West Virginia abortion bill
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

For years, pro-life advocates have been busy at the state level, enacting legislation that would significantly regulate or even forbid abortion. Of course, few if any of those laws have gone into effect. That’s because of what Justice Scalia once called the Supreme Court’s “ad hoc nullification machine.” That routinely leads to courts finding these laws unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

Abortion advocates have long lamented this activity, but for years have been complacent in relying on their bulwark in the Supreme Court. But, now that there is a genuine possibility that Roe/Casey will be overturned and states given more leeway to regulate abortion, abortion advocates are trying to play catch-up. And their chances don’t look great.

A recent bill introduced in West Virginia to much media fanfare is a good example. The bill would repeal all restrictions on abortion in current West Virginia law, which include the following: a total ban on all abortions after 20 weeks, a mandatory 24-hour waiting period, a ban on partial-birth abortions, a requirement that doctors provide medical care to babies born alive accidentally during an abortion, limits on public funding, and a ban on abortion pills prescribed without an in-person doctor visit.

That’s an extremely radical bill. In reality, however, it’s just political theater. The West Virginia legislature is dominated by Republicans (a two-to-one majority in their Senate and almost three-to one in the Assembly), and their Republican governor is publicly pro-life and has signed pro-life legislation. There’s no way that extreme bill will ever become law.

But it shows the desperation of abortion defenders who finally realize that they may actually have to make their case to the American people instead of nine unelected judges. And it highlights how radical their agenda is, compared with the interests of the American people.

The advocates for such bills want there to be no restrictions or legal barriers to abortion. That West Virginia bill is similar to other extreme abortion expansion bills passed in recent years in abortion stalwarts like New York, New Jersey, California, and Hawaii. And it’s basically the current law under Roe/Casey.

Americans are nowhere near as radical as that. A recent Knights of Columbus/Marist College poll shows that only 17% of Americans want abortion allowed at any time during pregnancy (which is the law under Roe/Casey), 12% say abortion should only be legal during the first six months of pregnancy, and 22% think it should be limited to the first three months. Another 49% say it should never be legal, or only permitted in rare circumstances. In other words, 83% of Americans say that abortion should be limited in ways that are not currently possible under Roe/Casey.

The result of this persistent moderation of the American people is that abortion will be much more restricted in our country if Roe/Casey are overruled. Only three states plus the District of Columbia have laws that would protect abortion for all nine months of pregnancy, like that West Virginia bill and Roe/Casey. Over a dozen more states protect pre-viability abortions either by statute or judicial ruling. Virtually every other state has either a pre-Roe restrictive law still on the books or has enacted restrictions in recent years like those on the books in West Virginia.

Abortion advocates have been complacent for many years, relying on their “ad hoc nullification machine” in the courts to hold back legislative regulations on abortion. But they have also been defeated convincingly in the battle for popular opinion. Wide majorities of Americans reject the radicalism of abortion without limits. And if Roe and Casey are overturned, there will be a dramatic shift in American law toward protecting preborn human lives.

 

434 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Edward Mechmann

Edward Mechmann is an attorney and Director of Public Policy for the Archdiocese of New York.

Social Share

  • google-share

3 Comments

  1. Micki Kaye February 10, 2022 at 2:19 pm Reply

    Prayers this atrocity is ended

  2. Richard February 10, 2022 at 5:38 pm Reply

    I think the only radical pro-abortion strategy they have is to say “let’s enact Roe v. Wade as a statute (or as a state constitutional amendment)”, and to hope that at the same time people don’t look carefully at the actual content of what they are doing. But hopefully the overturning of Roe v. Wade will also lead to more publicity concerning what it actually said and did, which should decrease popular enthusiasm for it.

  3. Carol Crossed February 16, 2022 at 2:08 pm Reply

    The stats on who does and who does not support Roe v Wade are conflicting. That is likely because respondents to surveys do not know the radical nature of R v W (or perhaps Doe v Bolton.) And no clarification is made in the survey question because that would appear ‘leading’. It is amazing that nearly 50 years later the public is unaware of what is in R v W. Despite the media and journalists introducing the subject tout it as the most volatile issue of our time, or the greatest issue since slavery, the media are accountable for this failure to educate.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

IVF: The Frozen Sleep Evading Time

07 May 2025

Report: "The Abortion Pill Harms Women"

05 May 2025

New York Pushes Asissted Suicide

30 Apr 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.