Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Summer 2023
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • INSISTING ON LIFE
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
    • HLF In The News
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2023
    • Great Defender of Life 2023 Dinner Ticket
    • Great Defender of Life 2023 Young Adult / Student Ticket
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Cart

From the Website

Back to Winter 2022
0 Comment

China Closes Abortion Clinics Amid Continued Fallout of One-Child Policy

Madeline Fry Schultz
China's one-child policy, global birthrates, world population statistics
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

With its infamous one-child policy, China discouraged births in the country for more than 30 years. Now, the Wall Street Journal reports, the country is facing a low (and declining) fertility rate and finding it difficult to suddenly encourage the births of more, not fewer, babies.

Though China’s one-child policy ended in 2016, it has had lasting effects. Several cultural and societal factors could be playing a role in the declining fertility rate, including delayed marriages and fewer women of childbearing age.

Another problem is that many women have already had multiple abortions, which can affect fertility and make it difficult to bear a child later on. China has a higher infertility rate than the rest of the world (18% compared with a global standard of 15% of couples of reproductive age, according to Peking University researchers), which some attribute to its aging population, and others pin on the prevalence of abortions.

To encourage population growth, China is promoting services for couples hoping to conceive, including in vitro fertilization, and even closing some abortion clinics. The Wall Street Journal reports that “the number of family-planning centers, primarily used for abortions, sterilizations and insertions of intrauterine devices, has dwindled to 2,810 across China in 2020, less than 10% of the number in 2014.”

Although China’s reasoning for limiting abortions and encouraging births is practical, rather than principled, its push to replace its aging population will certainly be a good thing for couples and newborns.

Here in the United States, the fertility rate is also declining, a trend that Pew Research notes “likely reflects the lingering effects of the Great Recession, as well as longer-term demographic changes such as increased educational attainment among women and delays in marriage.” But the good news is that, although there is no federal push to shut down abortion clinics, abortion rates are also falling; in the past few years, abortion rates fell to their lowest level since Roe v. Wade.

Still, according to Worldometer, the global number of abortions performed in 2021 was more than 42.6 million, a number greater than post-birth deaths by any single cause, including COVID-19, cancer, AIDS, or car accidents. Since fertility rates across the globe are below replacement levels, i.e. more people are dying than being born, the BBC reports, 23 countries including Japan, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Thailand, and South Korea will see their populations cut to half their current size by the end of the century, with China’s cut nearly in half. While China struggles to restore birth rates, perhaps the rest of the globe can begin to see the lasting destructive effects of federally endorsed abortion.

____________________________________

Original Bio:

66 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Madeline Fry Schultz

Madeline Fry Schultz is a writer in Washington, D.C.

Social Share

  • google-share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR

Recent Posts

Pro-Life Principles and Politicians

18 Sep 2023

South Dakota's Pro-Abortion Amendment: An Analysis

15 Sep 2023

Vice President Kamala Harris Launching Pro-Abortion Tour on College Campuses

08 Sep 2023

CURRENT ISSUE

Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott B G Carter Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Hadley Arkes Helen Alvaré Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Julia Duin Kristan Hawkins Laura Echevarria Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Patrick J. Flood Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro W. Ross Blackburn Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Pages

  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.