Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Spring 2023 FULL ISSUE
    • Spring 2023 pdf
    • Symposium: Where Do We Go from Dobbs?
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • INSISTING ON LIFE
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
    • HLF In The News
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2023
    • Great Defender of Life 2023 Dinner Ticket
    • Great Defender of Life 2023 Young Adult / Student Ticket
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Cart

NEWSworthy

0 Comment

IN MEMORY OF SENATOR JAMES LANE BUCKLEY

John Grondelski
Senator James L. Buckley
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

James Lane Buckley died August 18, having passed his 100th birthday last March.

The soft-spoken Buckley catapulted to national prominence in November 1970 when, against expectations, he won a U.S. Senate seat from New York on the Conservative Party line, beating out a pair of liberals on the Democratic and Republican lines.  (One might argue the Ottinger-Goodell pair was the first iteration of a liberal “squad”).

Pro-lifers owe Senator Buckley a great debt.  He and Jesse Helms (R-NC) were the first senators to introduce constitutional amendments to overturn Roe v. Wade, an effort Buckley pursued during his one term in the Senate.

Buckley’s Human Life Amendment differed from Helms’ in that it more explicitly took account of abortion.  The Helms Amendment (which mirrored a similar proposal introduced in the House by then-Rep. Lawrence J. Hogan of Maryland, father of the former governor) basically copied the Fourteenth Amendment but made clear it applied “from the moment of conception.”  Buckley’s amendment explicitly spoke to abortion, banning except for those procedures necessary “to save the life of the mother.”  When the precision of that language was challenged—by Catholics trying to apply the double effect principle and by lawyers who already foresaw how far some concepts might be stretched by abortionists seeking to evade them—Buckley subsequently filed a revised version, allowing procedures “necessary to prevent the death of the mother.”  In that argument, Buckley presciently foresaw the efforts among abortionists today (as in Texas) who are seeking to pretend that prolife legislation imperils women’s lives.

Buckley personally testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee when then-Indiana Senator Birch Bayh conducted sham hearings on Human Life Amendments before burying them in September 1975.

Buckley ran for re-election in 1976 via a detour in offering himself as a compromise candidate in the Gerald Ford v. Ronald Reagan contest for the Republican presidential nomination that year.  Democrats and Liberals (a separate party in New York), smarting from his upset six years earlier, lined up solidly behind Daniel Patrick Moynihan.  Republicans did not: a Westchester liberal Republican challenged Buckley in the September Senate primary, while Buckley’s own fellow Empire State Republican senator, Jacob Javits, always kept him at a distance.  Moynihan defeated Buckley, 54-45%.

Buckley subsequently served in appointed positions in the Reagan administration and was later named a federal judge.  His attempt to return to politics—running for the Senate from his home in Connecticut in 1980—losing to Democrat Chris Dodd.

William F. Buckley, Jr., his brother (who died in 2008) and the conservative political activist, was wont to call James “the sainted Senator from New York.”  Today, I am sure Bill and St. Peter may be again using that appellation.

188 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
John Grondelski

John Grondelski (Ph.D., Fordham) was former associate dean of the School of Theology, Seton Hall University, South Orange, New Jersey.  All views expressed herein are exclusively his.

Social Share

  • google-share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR

Recent Posts

Pro-Life Principles and Politicians

18 Sep 2023

South Dakota's Pro-Abortion Amendment: An Analysis

15 Sep 2023

Vice President Kamala Harris Launching Pro-Abortion Tour on College Campuses

08 Sep 2023

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott B G Carter Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Hadley Arkes Helen Alvaré Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Laura Echevarria Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Patrick J. Flood Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro W. Ross Blackburn Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Pages

  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER

Follow Us On Twitter

Tweets by @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.