Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2023
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • INSISTING ON LIFE
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
    • HLF In The News
    • LIBERTY TO DO WHAT? Hadley Arkes and Rusty Reno join George McKenna June 1, 2022 in New York
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2022
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2022
    • Great Defender of Life 2022 Dinner Ticket
    • Great Defender of Life 2022 STUDENT or PREGNANCY CENTER STAFF Ticket
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2022
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Cart

Articles

Over 45 years of Life-Defending Articles At Your Fingertips
0 Comment

Royal Baby Love

13 Aug 2013
William Murchison
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

Oh, baby! Just can’t get enough of you!

After all, how many cuddly, brand-new royal kids are out there? Just one: Prince George. And does the world love him or not?
Consider:

 People magazine expects to sell 1.4 million copies of its “Royal Baby Joy!” collector’s issue.

 According to the New York Times, “Royal baby-watchers . . . helped lead to record traffic on celebrity Web sites.” Such as a 70 percent jump in unique visitors to People’s mobile site the day of his future majesty’s birth.

 The Times went on: “Both Us Weekly and HollywoodLife.com experienced their best month for Web site traffic in July because of the royal birth . . . Two photo galleries of the baby and William and Kate with the baby attracted more viewers than the Oscars.”

Can you believe it? This sort of thing shouldn’t be happening in the age of population bombs, diminishing global resources, unrelenting career tracks—and, yes, Roe v. Wade. The impulse to celebrate birth contradicts so many of our present public orthodoxies that you get to wondering just how orthodox these orthodoxies actually are. Maybe less so than we suppose from prolonged exposure to “the news.”

The royal identity of Prince George Alexander Louis, and his status as grandson of the late Princess Diana, provides a fillip to the international excitement: not much doubt there. What else goes on, though? Let’s venture a guess.

At the most obvious level, cuteness goes on. Babies are just—you know—babies; copies, at a basic, even primitive level, of Us. All the same features, yet barely developed. A kind of thrill goes through those who behold each freshly born set of arms and legs and instincts. A new Me—or Him—or Her—is at hand. How will it all work out? With what joys and pleasures along the way, what sorrows and pains? Wondering about such things, and bracing for the answers, is part of the New Baby experience.

But that’s just the doorway to contemplation—however silent or voluble, deliberate or unconscious—of what really goes on in new birth. What really goes on is projection of the family, the breed, the race—meaning, without respect to particular and specific cultures—the human race. This is how it’s done, boys and girls, and always has been: new life brought forth miraculously (because it is a miracle, and nothing short of it) in order to carry humanity forward in time. This is according to a compelling if partially veiled design believed—known—to be divinely ordained.

Come to think of it, the Creator of absolutely everything chose to reveal Himself to the world in the form and flesh of . . . a baby. We see a little more clearly, maybe, that the instinct to love new life comes naturally, overriding all else.

H. R. H. George Alexander Louis is a timely gift to a world fixated on fears and fancies of the most ephemeral kind. His parents appear to know what they have got. Following a charity polo match in which he participated more sluggishly than usual, his princely father observed: “I was in baby mode out there, thinking about nappies. I really wasn’t in the zone.”

A good place for the modern world, wouldn’t you say?—“In baby mode.”


3,343 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
William Murchison

William Murchison, a former syndicated columnist, is a senior editor of the Human Life Review. He will soon finish his book on moral restoration in our time.

Social Share

  • google-share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR

Recent Posts

Legal Issues on Chemical Abortions

13 Mar 2023

HHS weighs declaring access to abortion a "public health emergency’

08 Mar 2023

Rihanna’s Super Bowl pregnancy announcement is an unexpected pro-life moment

15 Feb 2023

CURRENT ISSUE

Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott B G Carter Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kathryn Jean Lopez Kristan Hawkins Laura Echevarria Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Meaghan Bond Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Patrick J. Flood Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro W. Ross Blackburn Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Pages

  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • TOPICS
  • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER

Follow Us On Twitter

Tweets by @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.