Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2024: NEW MEDIA ADDED!
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner TABLE for TEN Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 2024 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2024
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2024
    • ARCHIVE: GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

BLOG

2 Comments

Scarecrow and Tin Man

Diane Moriarty
divisiveness, post-Roe, R.B.Ginsburg
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

After the successful overturn of the national abortion mandate known as Roe v. Wade, the next battle for prolifers is “winning hearts and minds.” The problem is when it comes to hearts and minds someone else got there first.  Or something. The unhinged behavior coming from women on the abortion-rights side doesn’t add up since they’re doing well at the voting booth. So, it’s not about being very passionate about politics. This goes deeper. It goes to places in the heart and mind where intellectual insecurity and sexual frustration dwell, and both are a prescription for derangement.

The intellectual chafe arises when they are called upon to present a rebuttal to the pro-life stance. In my experience the women who react violently when they come face to face with pro-life sensibilities are both intelligent and educated, so it’s not because they are incapable of argument that they don’t have one. It’s because for fifty years they didn’t need one. The 1973 Roe decision was considered “settled law.” And they had a lovable munchkin of a pro-choice jurist named Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who they turned into an abortion culture icon—the Notorious RBG.

It must have been flattering to be a woman of a certain age and have college kids wearing T-shirts with your face on it. And Justice Ginsburg did believe abortion should be legal. But she was no fan of the “breathtaking” and “extraordinary” Roe decision, which, she also believed, had “halted a political process that was moving in a reform direction,” and, as a result, “prolonged divisiveness and deferred stable settlement of the issue.”  Ginsburg’s life was the law. She was strong-minded. If she had lived to be on the Court when the Dobbs case came up, how would she have voted? RBG as abortion culture icon? Or RBG as Hamlet? Suffer slings and arrows, or play nice? Perhaps she would have honored the Law she loved and voted to overturn one she didn’t, one where, she said, “the Supreme Court step[ped] boldly in front of the political process” and “seemed entirely to remove the ball from the legislators’ court.” If so, it would have been a clarifying moment for those buying into the too simple narrative that Roe was challenged only by “bible thumping” Right Wingers. Or perhaps not—in the blink of a venomous eye Justice Ginsburg would have gone from Media Darling to Wicked Witch threatening their inner Dorothy.

The “prolonged divisiveness” that troubled her grew deeper and wider as time went on, and now, with the overturning of Roe, it’s a bitter chasm; we have angry pinched minds behind angry pinched faces, lifelong friendships strained, families torn apart. Recently someone I trusted, someone who sent me birthday and Christmas cards, spitefully informed me that every time one of my pro-life blogs gets posted she retaliates by using my name—without my permission—to make a donation “in my honor” to the murderous organization known as Planned Parenthood.

If the mental exertion needed to support the progressively flailing logic of the pro-abortion argument is exhausting (first it was the rusty coat hanger hyperbole, then emancipation, then it’s not really a baby, and now it’s just plain no apologies), challenging one’s comfort zone about sex begets sexual frustration: If you can’t be 100 percent sure that having sex will be inconsequential, one way or another, and since it’s necessary for one’s enjoyment, then interfering with that equals sexual repression. This mindset exists in women past childbearing age too, so it’s not the actual possibility of becoming pregnant that rattles them. It’s the pesky intrusion of procreation into the beloved concept of sexual freedom, even when procreation is hypothetical. And so we have stampedes on voting booths to enshrine abortion through the ninth month (Let’s not take any chances!) in state constitutions. But it’s not just the sex-equals-babies downer in play here. Fear of pregnancy is being promoted.

A month or so ago I was watching a morning news program on broadcast television. They have a resident lady doctor who gives medical advice. Blonde hair; wears a white coat. The issue was how some over-the-counter pain medications, when taken by women using birth control pills, greatly increase the incidence of blood clots. She allowed that birth control pills alone can also cause blood clots. Then, as if she had been hit by a political correctness thunderbolt, she suddenly looked directly into the camera and, while wagging her finger, exclaimed: “But not as much as pregnancy does!” So, pregnancy itself is now a disease (ergo abortion is health care).

Wow. That sure throws a wet blanket over the poignant family moment when a young woman shares her news that she’s pregnant for the first time with the rest of the clan. Do the grandmas and aunties gather around and kiss her cheek and pat her back and chirp their delight? And when the young woman shyly wonders what it’s like—“Does it really hurt? Will I be okay?”—do they say: “Don’t worry, women have been doing this since time began, you’ll do fine, we all went through it …” Or do they clutch their pearls and yell: “You’re gonna DIE of blood clots!” How many homes did this very well-known New York City television program beam into that morning? How many young women expecting for the first time were watching? Hearts and minds? More like heartless and brainless.

At least Dorothy’s friends had aspirations.

309 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Diane Moriarty

Diane Moriarty is a free-lance writer living in Manhattan.  She previously wrote an art review column for Able Newspaper as well as articles outside the column. At the close of the last century DISH!, an independent film she wrote, produced, and directed was given a run at Anthology Film Archives by Jonas Mekus.

Social Share

  • google-share

2 Comments

  1. Pingback: The Human Life Review - The Human Life Review

  2. Pingback: The Human Life Review Don’t Go Tell It on the Mountain - The Human Life Review

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

IVF: The Frozen Sleep Evading Time

07 May 2025

Report: "The Abortion Pill Harms Women"

05 May 2025

New York Pushes Asissted Suicide

30 Apr 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.