Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2025
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

BLOG

1 Comment

Wanted! Pro-Life Democrats Who Will Run for Office!

Mary Meehan
Democrats, prolifers
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The message above should appear all over the country, wherever pro-life activists gather. For many years, they have hoped (in a vague sort of way) that more Democrats would be pro-life. Few, though, have done much to make that actually happen, and those who tried often lacked support from other pro-lifers. Yet if they receive enough money and volunteer help, pro-life Democrats should be able to establish a strong presence in the Democratic Party. The group called Democrats for Life of America has been trying to do this, but it needs far more financial and volunteer help.

This writer is a political independent who believes that the pro-life movement should not be owned by any political party. Instead, it should work to keep the Republicans pro-life and to increase by leaps and bounds the numbers of pro-life Democrats. Strongly pro-life Democratic candidates are needed at every level—from city council member to presidential candidate. Think of the difference that just one good pro-life candidate could make in the Democrats’ presidential debates! At the congressional level, some pro-life Democratic candidates could focus on conservative and rural areas. Others could make challenges on liberal turf—stressing the longtime Democratic tradition of standing up for little people. “We’re pro-woman and pro-child!” might be a good slogan.

To some prolifers, all of this might sound like daydreaming. But they should think about the great work done in the Republican Party by pro-life leaders and volunteers at national, state, and local levels. Why not duplicate that work on the Democratic side?

In addition to a pro-life Democratic presidential candidate, there is a need for hundreds of candidates at the congressional level. Initially, the greatest emphasis should be placed on states where there is major pro-life strength already, but no state should be written off. Abortion-supporting incumbents should face challengers who are well-prepared, well-supported financially, and sustained by boatloads of volunteers. The challenging candidates must know how to emphasize the joys of children and the hope they bring to all of us—a point overlooked in many abortion debates.

The pro-life movement has become far too dependent on the Republican Party. Republicans have done a great deal to defend unborn children, but they cannot win every election. When they lose the presidency—or even one house of Congress—it becomes much harder to defend the unborn. There is a great need for many strong pro-life candidates in Democratic Party primaries and conventions. There should never be another Democratic presidential race like the current one, where all of the candidates support abortion. The goal must be a campaign in which all of them defend and celebrate life. Of course, it will take an enormous effort just to begin turning the Democrats around, but prolifers know all about hard work and how to do it.

442 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Mary Meehan

—Mary Meehan is a senior editor of the Human Life Review.

Social Share

  • google-share

One Comment

  1. Arthur McGowan February 27, 2020 at 3:29 pm Reply

    The Democrat party is not of divine origin. It’s not even mentioned in the Constitution. There is no more reason to hope that it continue in existence than to hope that any other evil, collectivist, coercive party continue in existence. I would give examples, but I don’t want to run afoul of Godwin’s Law.

    Who needs “pro-life” socialist totalitarians in office, at ANY level?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

Israeli Supreme Court Minimizes Biological Parenthood

22 May 2025

Pro-life Groups Can’t be Forced to Accommodate Abortions, Federal Judge Rules

14 May 2025

Yonkers Woman Learns Abortion is Not the ‘Quick Fix’ She Thought 

12 May 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.