Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2024: NEW MEDIA ADDED!
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner TABLE for TEN Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 2024 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2024
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2024
    • ARCHIVE: GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

BLOG

3 Comments

Whatever Works: Cultural Codes, Religious Beliefs, and Structural Biases

Connie Marshner
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 “…our debate about religious freedom should include a conversation about freeing religions and religious people from prejudices that they needn’t cling to and can indeed jettison . . . rightly bowing to the enlightenments of modernity.”

Thus spake Frank Bruni in an April 3 op-ed column in the New York Times.

Mitchell Gold, a prominent gay philanthropist, had been more specific when he told Bruni: Church leaders must be made “to take homosexuality off the sin list.”

 “Be made” to take something “off the sin list” “Be made” by whom?

“Deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs, and structural biases have to be changed,” insisted Hillary Clinton at the “Women in the World Summit” in New York on April 26. Otherwise, girls and women would never experience “full participation in every aspect of their societies.”religious political

“Full participation” is deep-seated Clinton code for access to any kind of abortion at any time during pregnancy paid for by the public. But she’s not saying it outright, because most voters don’t like abortion. It’s on their “sin list.”

Glad we’ve got that clear now. Religion is the enemy of health and happiness. To solve today’s social problems all we need to do is jettison yesterday’s religious beliefs. Hope the imams in Syria are listening and willing to oblige.

Clinton and Bruni are talking about what motivates their constituencies: Total sexual freedom without hindrance or consequence.

Are those really the issues that Democratic funders and voters consider of supreme importance?

What has Hillary said about Baltimore lately?

Didn’t there use to be “deep-seated cultural codes” that caused people to respect policemen? To obey parents? To refrain from stealing, and setting fire to other people’s cars?

If she were being logical, Hillary would be delighted that our society seems to have discarded those “cultural codes” pretty easily.

Didn’t there use to be “structural biases” about marriages coming before baby carriages? Didn’t fathers impose “deep-seated cultural codes” on their sons in the name of civilization?

Clinton should be happy. Those structural biases seem to have vanished pretty much without a trace. At least in some parts of Baltimore.

Welcome to the future under the Clinton/Bruni kulturkampf ultimatum.

In his 20-minute filibuster at a press conference with the Japanese Prime Minister on April 28, President Obama talked about how “we” need to care more deeply for Baltimore’s kids in deprived circumstances by voting in the new government programs he wants. “They’re our kids,” he said.

Uh, Mr. President: They are their parents’ kids.

Or is that idea a “prejudice” religious people “needn’t cling to” any longer?

In 2008, Hillary waxed eloquent about how religion is “a spur, an anchor, to center one in the storms, but also to guide one forward in the day-to-day living that is part of everyone’s journey.”

Hmmm . . . sounds like the description of a cultural code or structural bias to me.

Oh, how long ago did she say it? Guess she must think that the activist and donor base of the Democratic Party have “bowed to the enlightenments of modernity” and she has to play to a new audience—she ought to know.

As her mentor Saul Alinsky said, whatever works.

Looking at Baltimore, it’s worth asking: Does it?

*     *     *     *     *

Connie Marshner organized her first pro-life meeting in 1971, among Capitol Hill staffers who sensed a drift toward legalizing abortion.  She’s worked in the movement in one capacity or another ever since.

 

 

471 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.

Social Share

  • google-share

3 Comments

  1. Michael April 30, 2015 at 2:22 pm Reply

    Good article! Couldn’t agree more…the brave new world we live in has only one unforgivable sin: to have vlaues that inform your views of other people. It’s OK to be a drug addict, it’s OK to kill babies or leave them in the lurtch with yo babby mamma, it’s OK to hate Christianity and pander like a dog to islam…but don’t you DARE insist that anyone else needs to take responsibility for their own life. To do so is bigoted, homophobic, ignorant, and any other empty headed lable people can come up with. After all, if people took responsibility for themselves, the state would not be their nanny…and that would be horrible.

  2. Dan Arico April 30, 2015 at 3:52 pm Reply

    A lot has been made of the heroic mother who dragged her son out of the looting and took him home. I’m glad she did and I hope he has learned a valuable lesson.

    But….

    She’s a single mother with six children. How did that happen? How many other single mothers are there whose children are still out in the streets contributing to the chaos? We desperately need to fix a system that generates unwed mothers and broken families.

  3. Pingback: “Frankly, I Could Give a Damn.” - The Human Life Review - The Human Life Review

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

Israeli Supreme Court Minimizes Biological Parenthood

22 May 2025

Pro-life Groups Can’t be Forced to Accommodate Abortions, Federal Judge Rules

14 May 2025

Yonkers Woman Learns Abortion is Not the ‘Quick Fix’ She Thought 

12 May 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.