Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Fall 2022 PDF
    • SUMMER 2022 ARTICLES
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • INSISTING ON LIFE
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
    • HLF In The News
    • LIBERTY TO DO WHAT? Hadley Arkes and Rusty Reno join George McKenna June 1, 2022 in New York
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2022
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2022
    • Great Defender of Life 2022 Dinner Ticket
    • Great Defender of Life 2022 STUDENT or PREGNANCY CENTER STAFF Ticket
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2022
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Cart

BLOG

3 Comments

Whatever Works: Cultural Codes, Religious Beliefs, and Structural Biases

30 Apr 2015
Connie Marshner
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 “…our debate about religious freedom should include a conversation about freeing religions and religious people from prejudices that they needn’t cling to and can indeed jettison . . . rightly bowing to the enlightenments of modernity.”

Thus spake Frank Bruni in an April 3 op-ed column in the New York Times.

Mitchell Gold, a prominent gay philanthropist, had been more specific when he told Bruni: Church leaders must be made “to take homosexuality off the sin list.”

 “Be made” to take something “off the sin list” “Be made” by whom?

“Deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs, and structural biases have to be changed,” insisted Hillary Clinton at the “Women in the World Summit” in New York on April 26. Otherwise, girls and women would never experience “full participation in every aspect of their societies.”religious political

“Full participation” is deep-seated Clinton code for access to any kind of abortion at any time during pregnancy paid for by the public. But she’s not saying it outright, because most voters don’t like abortion. It’s on their “sin list.”

Glad we’ve got that clear now. Religion is the enemy of health and happiness. To solve today’s social problems all we need to do is jettison yesterday’s religious beliefs. Hope the imams in Syria are listening and willing to oblige.

Clinton and Bruni are talking about what motivates their constituencies: Total sexual freedom without hindrance or consequence.

Are those really the issues that Democratic funders and voters consider of supreme importance?

What has Hillary said about Baltimore lately?

Didn’t there use to be “deep-seated cultural codes” that caused people to respect policemen? To obey parents? To refrain from stealing, and setting fire to other people’s cars?

If she were being logical, Hillary would be delighted that our society seems to have discarded those “cultural codes” pretty easily.

Didn’t there use to be “structural biases” about marriages coming before baby carriages? Didn’t fathers impose “deep-seated cultural codes” on their sons in the name of civilization?

Clinton should be happy. Those structural biases seem to have vanished pretty much without a trace. At least in some parts of Baltimore.

Welcome to the future under the Clinton/Bruni kulturkampf ultimatum.

In his 20-minute filibuster at a press conference with the Japanese Prime Minister on April 28, President Obama talked about how “we” need to care more deeply for Baltimore’s kids in deprived circumstances by voting in the new government programs he wants. “They’re our kids,” he said.

Uh, Mr. President: They are their parents’ kids.

Or is that idea a “prejudice” religious people “needn’t cling to” any longer?

In 2008, Hillary waxed eloquent about how religion is “a spur, an anchor, to center one in the storms, but also to guide one forward in the day-to-day living that is part of everyone’s journey.”

Hmmm . . . sounds like the description of a cultural code or structural bias to me.

Oh, how long ago did she say it? Guess she must think that the activist and donor base of the Democratic Party have “bowed to the enlightenments of modernity” and she has to play to a new audience—she ought to know.

As her mentor Saul Alinsky said, whatever works.

Looking at Baltimore, it’s worth asking: Does it?

*     *     *     *     *

Connie Marshner organized her first pro-life meeting in 1971, among Capitol Hill staffers who sensed a drift toward legalizing abortion.  She’s worked in the movement in one capacity or another ever since.

 

 

379 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.

Social Share

  • google-share

3 Comments

  1. Michael April 30, 2015 at 2:22 pm Reply

    Good article! Couldn’t agree more…the brave new world we live in has only one unforgivable sin: to have vlaues that inform your views of other people. It’s OK to be a drug addict, it’s OK to kill babies or leave them in the lurtch with yo babby mamma, it’s OK to hate Christianity and pander like a dog to islam…but don’t you DARE insist that anyone else needs to take responsibility for their own life. To do so is bigoted, homophobic, ignorant, and any other empty headed lable people can come up with. After all, if people took responsibility for themselves, the state would not be their nanny…and that would be horrible.

  2. Dan Arico April 30, 2015 at 3:52 pm Reply

    A lot has been made of the heroic mother who dragged her son out of the looting and took him home. I’m glad she did and I hope he has learned a valuable lesson.

    But….

    She’s a single mother with six children. How did that happen? How many other single mothers are there whose children are still out in the streets contributing to the chaos? We desperately need to fix a system that generates unwed mothers and broken families.

  3. Pingback: “Frankly, I Could Give a Damn.” - The Human Life Review - The Human Life Review

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR

Recent Posts

Hit and run violence after Roe: Can't we talk about the morality of abortion?

28 Jan 2023

Abortion activist attempts to expose crisis pregnancy centers—and fails

17 Jan 2023

An Abortion Clinic in Your Neighborhood

09 Jan 2023

CURRENT ISSUE

Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott B G Carter Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Laura Echevarria Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Meaghan Bond Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Patrick J. Flood Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro W. Ross Blackburn Wesley J. Smith William Doino Jr. William Murchison

Pages

  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • TOPICS
  • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER

Follow Us On Twitter

Tweets by @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.