Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2024: NEW MEDIA ADDED!
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner TABLE for TEN Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 2024 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2024
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2024
    • ARCHIVE: GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

BLOG

0 Comment

With Friends Like These . . .

Diane Moriarty
Cox case, Texas Supreme Court, Trisomy-18
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

Long-term relationships, be they with family or friends, carry a lot of history. Obviously, most of it is pleasant or the bond would be severed at some point. But there’s also a trail of disappointments and betrayals, which, as long as they are relatively minor in nature, inspire the “life is too short” and “keep peace in the family” adages. But human nature being what it is, platitudes aren’t enough. We are emotional carnivores, and we need our pound of flesh. Before modern-day politics reared its ugly head and injected vicious backbiting from the partisan realm into our daily lives, we had a time-honored way of getting past our grievances: You talked about people behind their backs!

I don’t mean malicious, bridge-burning stuff. I mean: “She thinks her angel food cake is as good as her mother’s—it’s not.” Or: “He’s so proud of his golf game—but he has no swing!” Yet when we meet for family dinner or neighborhood barbecue it’s bro hugs and kiss, kiss and all is well. It’s not hypocritical because there is true affection there, but this wee bit of grousing acts as a pressure valve that provides if not a whole pound of flesh a nibble that satisfies. And there’s opportunity for atonement: “Well, her angel food cake isn’t much, but her lasagna can’t be beat.” Or: “His golf game is nothing, but what I wouldn’t give for his lawn!” There’s also opportunity for humility: “What are they saying about me?” Alas, we’ve been robbed of this home remedy.

The harm inflicted by Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” comment about Trump voters during the 2016 campaign cannot be underestimated or backpedaled away from. There was an audible gasp from the political class, a group not exactly known for setting a decorum high bar during campaign season, for what she did overstepped a line that until that point was sacrosanct: Beat up on your opponent all you like but never attack the voters. This was grounded in a sensibility that now seems quaint. Whoever wins will need the entire country to accept him or her, not just their own party, indeed, the peaceful transition of power depends on it. Clinton did not want to be President of the United States, she only aspired to be a president for Democrats. There’s an icy cold logic to it; I don’t need Republican voters to put me into office, so I can disregard them. In so doing she forgot the wonderful opportunity our binary political system affords the winner, which is to respectfully acknowledge, in a country where landslides are rare, the sentiments of those—these days close to the half of the country—who didn’t vote for you. It’s the Unity, stupid.

Unfortunately, on both sides of the aisle the political class’s audible gasp quicky turned into the sound of wheels turning: Hmm, getting the voters at each other’s throats based on their political party “identity” makes it personal, and will not only increase turnout (for all the wrong reasons) but they’ll now be voting against one another rather than on policies and voting records. Can we ever get back the harmony in our interpersonal relationships that the political-division-for-profit industry has put asunder?

Back to the “home remedy” theme. So, maybe it was a little bit phony, but it served a purpose. It kept small grievances from growing out of control. Now they run amok while people hide behind lofty concepts. Many of us who didn’t vote for Hillary Clinton have endured years of shrill harangues with jaw-jutting postures by those claiming to be Saving Democracy and Fighting Hitler (which the hyperventilated and moronic anti-Trump Resistance movement [the #Resistance] was based on), but all I can think of is: Umm, actually . . . you’re just nursing a grudge.

It will be no easy task to get people to exchange their Joan of Arc armor or Superman’s cape for low-voltage simple bellyaching, but the true threat to democracy is to be found in the ego-driven digressions. And tossing around Hitler comparisons takes its toll. A graphic example is the recent case of a baby with Trisomy 18 whose mother sought an exception to Texas’s strict abortion ban.

Dr. Steve Calvin, a pro-life OB-GYN ( There are no black-and-white answers in the Texas trisomy 18 abortion case | America Magazine), affirms that although some children with Trisomy 18—a chromosomal abnormality with a range of potential effects—can survive, though disabled, into their teenage years, the Cox baby had a particularly severe case and could not. He was also concerned about Ms. Cox’s elevated glucose levels and the risk of gestational hypertension and diabetes. Although Dr. Calvin felt that the court should have deferred to medical expertise in this case, he was skeptical of “pro-choice activity.” Just before the Texas Supreme Court overruled a lower-court- ruling that would have granted Ms. Cox an exception to the state’s ban, she travelled to New Mexico and had an abortion. Ms. Cox received the diagnosis in late November, (A woman who sued Texas for access to abortion seeks a procedure out of state instead (kunm.org) so by then precious time had gone by while the abortion-rights lawyers’ legal issues played out; time being of the essence in terms of her personal health apparently secondary to the lawyers’ desire to sue Texas. Now she has been invited to attend Biden’s State of the Union address. Will she be disgraced with a standing ovation to serve the interests of the abortion lobby’s agenda and Biden’s political needs?

The Cox baby case has presented a gray area for prolifers because of its dire medical particulars, but such details weren’t of interest to the abortion rights lawyers who seized upon this mother and her baby’s tragedy, or the spinmeisters behind the State of the Union publicity stunt. And a different shade of gray looms. Trisomy 18 has a spectrum, the Cox baby happened to be on the worst end of it, and thanks to abortion-friendly media and lawyers who make use of it, this case has become a cornerstone for the argument to bring back Roe v. Wade. But something else lurks in the shadows, the possibility of canonizing aborting because of disability. Which is Hitler and staring people right in the face while going over their heads at the same time.

 

278 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Diane Moriarty

Diane Moriarty is a free-lance writer living in Manhattan.  She previously wrote an art review column for Able Newspaper as well as articles outside the column. At the close of the last century DISH!, an independent film she wrote, produced, and directed was given a run at Anthology Film Archives by Jonas Mekus.

Social Share

  • google-share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

RFK Jr, Autism, Eugenics--and Pro-Life Silence?

09 May 2025

IVF: The Frozen Sleep Evading Time

07 May 2025

Report: "The Abortion Pill Harms Women"

05 May 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.