Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • LIBERTY TO DO WHAT? Hadley Arkes and Rusty Reno join George McKenna June 1, 2022 in New York
      • EVENT: LIBERTY TO DO WHAT? With McKenna, Arkes and Reno June 1, 2022 at 6:00 PM
    • WINTER 2022 PDF
    • Winter 2022 Articles
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • INSISTING ON LIFE
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
    • HLF In The News
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2021
    • Great Defender of Life 2021 Dinner Ticket
    • SPONSOR a TABLE at the Great Defender of Life 2021 Dinner
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2021
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2021
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Cart

BLOG

0 Comment

You Don’t Say!

22 Feb 2022
Diane Moriarty
abortion, roe v. wade, Women’s Health Protection Act
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Abortion serves men, because it allows them sex without responsibility, and always has. “You take care of it.” A Democratic administration is intent on enshrining it. Who says they don’t open doors for us anymore? Which is why the hands-off-my-body placards at abortion-rights rallies and posters in dorm rooms—the tacit implication being that they are male hands—make no sense. But it’s an emotional narrative and it’s got legs, which says a lot about the seething and under-examined anger that “pro-choice” women have towards men. Indeed, in so many ways, the imagery and posturing surrounding abortion presents as one thing but is actually another. A rose is a rose is a rose? The hell it is.

At a press conference last fall, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi responded to criticism of her so-called Women’s Health Protection Act (“health” presented here as one thing but really meaning another), which aims to codify abortion on demand in federal law in order to nullify the overturning of Roe v. Wade (should it happen). Pelosi pointed out that she had given birth to five children in six years, and then insisted that only those who did as she had done had a right to be critical of her stance. Lots of pro-life women have lots of kids, and Pelosi knows it. And demanding awe for the “five kids in six years” marathon of her own choosing? What’s that got to do with the price of coffee? Pelosi’s chin-jutting challenge was really a dig at those for whom it’s impossible to bear children at all, that is, men, effectively eliminating 50 percent of the population from the discussion.

“When men can get pregnant then they can tell me what to do” is a pro-abortion trope. Who are these men? Politicians? A mercurial lot. Last year, “pro-choice” Republican New Hampshire Governor Sununu attempted to add some “pro-life” cred to his resume by not vetoing a state budget bill that included a late-term abortion ban, hoping it would bring him national attention with a bid for the U.S. Senate. The abortion lobby applied pressure and, presto, now he’s trying to gut it (as per Kristan Hawkins, Students for Life Action). Again, “When a man gets pregnant . . .” creates a standard impossible to meet but by foot-stomping such as Pelosi’s it’s anointed as criteria. It’s a poor argument, embarrassing in its flawed logic, and built on sand. Should men stop wanting abortion on demand—that’s when “pro-choice” women need to start worrying. Fat chance.

A familiar female posture when the subject of abortion arises is with eyebrows raised, arms outstretched, palms turned up, and then, in a defensive tone, uttering: “It’s legal!” This doesn’t only indicate end of discussion; it indicates end of her need to be involved in any discussion. Because it’s legal. That’s what she says, but does she really think that black people being handcuffed and arrested for the crime of sitting down at an all-white lunch counter was justice for all? She says it’s about what’s legal, when what she means is it’s about having a free pass to suspend feeling. And those are the women still capable of feeling something.

The pro-abortion front says it is terrified at the mere possibility that Roe v. Wade could be overturned with the Dobbs case. But what would that mean? That overnight every state in the union must make abortion illegal the way Roe declared it must be legal in every state? Ridiculous. Because that is the precise Constitutional issue that afflicts Roe. Overturning it would only mean that the issue would return to the jurisdiction of individual states. In practical terms, that might mean extra travel for some seekers of abortion. But in America, the land of the entrepreneur, someone no doubt will launch a charter flight business, low rates. Gosh knows, Amtrak might even run a Women’s “Health” Protection Acela special. When Texas won the first round in its heartbeat-law legal fight, newly minted New York Governor Hochul jumped up to promise a free trip to her state for any woman in Texas who wanted an abortion. The pesky business of who would pay for it was sketchy, but, hey, it’s the thought that counts.

So, they say it’s about access, but what do they really mean? It’s about an idea. The idea that saying abortion is a “social good” and “sacred right” in one state but a “social ill” and “barbaric transgression” in another makes it untidy. It’s no longer one size fits all. And bureaucracy especially loves one size fits all. It’s ersatz consensus. Not that they’ll say so. Even if it’s what they mean.

165 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Diane Moriarty

Diane Moriarty is a free-lance writer living in Manhattan.

Social Share

  • google-share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR

Recent Posts

Abortion Extremism on the Loose

11 May 2022

Pro-abortion radicals are trying to intimidate pro-lifers

10 May 2022
Photo 48948354 © Natalia Bratslavsky | Dreamstime.com

Oklahoma House Passes Its Heartbeat Act

10 May 2022

CURRENT ISSUE

Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott B G Carter Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Hadley Arkes Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Laura Echevarria Leslie Fain Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Patrick J. Flood Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro W. Ross Blackburn Wesley J. Smith William Doino Jr. William Murchison

Pages

  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • LIBERTY TO DO WHAT? Hadley Arkes and Rusty Reno join George McKenna June 1, 2022 in New York

Follow Us On Twitter

Tweets by @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.