Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2025
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

NEWSworthy

1 Comment

Georgia’s ‘heartbeat’ abortion ban can stand for now, state Supreme Court rules

Matt Lamb
Georgia abortion law, pro-life victory in Georgia, state heartbeat laws
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

The Supreme Court of Georgia upheld the state’s law that generally protects preborn babies from abortions once a heartbeat is detected, typically around six weeks into the pregnancy.

The Oct. 24 ruling allows the law to remain in effect while court challenges continue. The law includes an exception for babies conceived in rape or incest, allowing them to be aborted at up to 20 weeks in the womb.

The American Civil Liberties Union had challenged the law, and a lower court had agreed with the ACLU. This decision overturns that ruling.

The theory from the ACLU was that the 2019 law was unconstitutional when it was passed. The group argued on behalf of the abortion industry that at the time it was passed in 2019, it “violated the United States Constitution as interpreted by [the] then-controlling-but-since-overruled decisions of the United States Supreme Court,” Justice Verda Colvin explained for the majority.

“Because Dobbs is controlling precedent on whether the United States Constitution confers a right to abortion, and because the parties and the trial court do not dispute that the LIFE Act complies with Dobbs, it follows that the LIFE Act did not violate the United States Constitution when enacted in 2019,” Colvin said.

She wrote that the court must apply Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the current federal standard, in its decision.

Abortionists and abortion supporters will now continue to argue the law “violates Georgians’ rights to privacy and equal protection under the state Constitution,” according to a statement from the ACLU.

The law is a positive development for preborn babies and pro-life advocates in the state, though plenty of work remains.

Georgia residents had more than 35,000 abortions in 2022, according to data obtained by the Charlotte Lozier Institute; 60% of these abortions took place at six weeks gestation or earlier. This means thousands of babies could still be saved each year.

The data on abortions also does not fully capture women who might get chemical abortion drugs through the mail.

This is why it is important for Georgia to continue to fight against abortion while also supporting pregnant mothers, babies, and families in choosing life through financial and other support services.

120 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Matt Lamb

Matt Lamb is an associate editor for The College Fix and a contributor to Washington Examiner's Beltway Confidential blog. He also works as a reporter for LifeSiteNews. He previously worked for Students for Life Action, Students for Life of America, and Turning Point USA.

More by Matt Lamb

Social Share

  • google-share

One Comment

  1. kevin ernst November 10, 2023 at 11:49 am Reply

    Tell the girl holding the red heart to not wear nail polish when pregnant.Nail polish has been shown to cause birth defects,and tooth whitening gel.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

Washington Post Tries and Fails to Debunk Study on Mifepristone Dangers

30 May 2025

Israeli Supreme Court Minimizes Biological Parenthood

22 May 2025

Pro-life Groups Can’t be Forced to Accommodate Abortions, Federal Judge Rules

14 May 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.