Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Summer 2025
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2025
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2025
    • Great Defender of Life Dinner TABLE for TEN 2025
    • Great Defender of Life Dinner Ticket 2025
    • Great Defender of Life 2025 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2025
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

NEWSworthy

0 Comment

Even Abortion Advocates Are Tired of Chemical Abortion Lies  

04 Dec 2025
Jacqueline O’Hara
chemical abortion, Donald Trump and abortion
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

As the debate over chemical abortion and its accessibility rages on, a new poll is showing that most American voters support stronger restrictions on the dangerous drugs.

A recent poll by McLaughlin & Associates discovered that 70% of American voters support reinstating the commonsense protections on chemical abortion drugs that the Food and Drug Administration under the Biden administration removed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Shockingly, this includes 57% of self-described “liberal” voters who say, at the very least, that in-person doctor’s visits be reinstated for the sake of women’s health and safety.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA had commonsense protections on chemical abortion drugs that included the requirement that women visit a doctor in person before acquiring the pill. Yet during the pandemic, the Biden administration’s FDA lifted that pesky requirement under the guise that it would enable women to acquire the pill without risking catching the coronavirus.

In January 2023, the FDA made this change permanent — to the dismay and shock of those who recognized the dangers this held for women. The change, and its subsequent permanence, opened women to the possibility of poisoning by abusive partners, predators, pimps, or groomers who wanted them to end their pregnancies — and yes, this has happened several times. It has also left women vulnerable to the possibility that they could face severe life-threatening complications alone in their bathrooms, rather than under the guidance of a licensed medical professional.

Rather than moving to reinstate the protections for women’s health and safety, however, the “pro-choice” and “pro-woman” party has done everything in its power to ensure that the pills remain widely accessible and unrestricted.

Interestingly, however, public opinion apparently does not lie with the abortion industry on this one. The majority of the likely voters polled by McLaughlin & Associates, for example, are pro-abortion, including 36% who were “strongly” pro-abortion. This is shocking considering the poll’s revelation that most Americans have “significant doubts about the safety of the chemical abortion drug.”

These revelations come at an interesting time. Just recently, the Trump administration shocked and disappointed many pro-life advocates by quietly approving a new generic version of the chemical abortion drug mifepristone.

While pro-life advocates clamored against the decision — with leaders such as former Vice President Mike Pence calling the move “a complete betrayal of the pro-life movement that elected President Trump” — White House press secretary Karoline Leavvitt asserted that the FDA and the Health and Human Services Department were “merely following the law.” She claimed the decision to approve the new drug was “not an endorsement of this drug by any means.”

Even so, pro-life advocates are disappointed by the decision. On an Oct. 29 press call, Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser said that the approval “now makes the [abortion] pill far more available, far more accessible, and far cheaper,” adding that “this is something that we should be outraged at, and we are.”

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has promised to “review all the evidence—including real-world outcomes—on the safety of this drug.” He also claimed the FDA only approved the new generic version due to federal law, which “requires approval when an application proves the generic is identical to the brand-name drug.”

Now, pro-lifers, and apparently even some pro-abortion advocates, hope that the HHS and FDA find a sense of urgency in investigating and reinstating basic protections on the pill. Only time will tell if they will.

5 people have visited this page. 5 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Jacqueline O’Hara

Jacqueline O’Hara is a Catholic writer from rural Virginia.

Social Share

  • google-share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

Wisconsin Bill Would Clarify Miscarriage Is Different From Abortion

02 Dec 2025

Robotic IVF: Technologically Impressive or Morally Problematic?

14 Nov 2025

What the 2025 Elections Mean for Pro-Lifers

06 Nov 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Clarke D. Forsythe Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Julia Duin Kristan Hawkins Laura Echevarria Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.