Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
rss
facebook
twitter
youtube
instagram
linkedin
  • CURRENT
    • Summer 2026
    • SPRING 2026 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Faithful Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2026
    • Great Defender of Life Dinner Ticket 2026
      • Great Defender of Life 2026 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • Great Defender of Life Dinner TABLE for TEN 2026
    • HOST COMMITTEE
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2026
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

APPENDIX C

Back to Summer 2026
0 Comment

APPENDIX C: The Anglican Church of Canada Publishes Pastoral Liturgies Blessing Euthanasia

Wesley J. Smith
Anglican Church of Canada, medical assistance in dying (MAiD)
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

[Wesley J. Smith is an author and a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Hu-man Exceptionalism. The following was posted June 24, 2026, on National Review Online (www.nationalreview.com).Copyright 2026 by National Review. Reprinted with permission.]

 

The Anglican Church of Canada has authorized clergy to bless people being euthanized just before, during, and after being lethally jabbed (when permitted by the bishop). From “Pastoral Liturgies at the Time of Death in Contexts of Medically Assisted Dying”:

It is not our intent to enter into the ethical arguments regarding MAiD, nor to provide a moral argument for or against MAiD. No matter where people are in their life journey, we as a Christian community and Christian leaders in particular are called to respond pastorally to the needs and concerns of the people before us. Wherever the church serves, we are the Body of Christ reaching out to the suffering, the sick, and the dying. When someone reaches out for pastoral care, the church responds: there is a duty of pastoral care.

If the Anglican Church can’t enter into an ethical argument about euthanasia what is the point of being a church? And given that suicide has always been considered an egregious sin in Christianity from its very early days, wouldn’t “Christian” pastoral care be obligated to at least try and help the suicidal person decide not to be made dead?

Here is another justification for blessing a euthanasia killing in the document:

Death is a natural part of life, and in the spirit of the Church’s continued ministry, we are called to walk alongside health care agencies and practitioners to offer a pastoral response and presence to those who are dying. As the Book of Alternative Services notes, “if the sick could not get to church, then the Church [. should] come to them.”

Natural death is “a natural part of life.” Being killed is not. Moreover, is it really properly a Christian act to “walk alongside” a doctor or nurse practitioner who kills? The earliest Christian ethical writing dating from about 100—the Didache—explicitly condemns “murder” as profoundly sinful. True, Canada has legalized this particular form of homicide, but the issue with regard to a church is not statutory legality, but rather, ethics and morality.

The document spouts false premises and shallow rationalizations for supporting being euthanized:

People who choose MAiD freely and without coercion may indeed be ready to go. They have been living with and suffering through complex health challenges and they want the pain to stop. They want to be able to sleep. They desperately do not want their families and loved ones to watch and wait, wondering how much longer? They have exhausted all medical options, and they know, everyone knows, that there is no cure. Some wish, most of all, not to be alone at the time of their death, and to die well. Some, who are Christian, also desire not to be alone at the time of their death, and to die well, and with the grace and blessing of God and with the presence of the Church at their side.

The law in Canada does not require that “all medical options” be exhausted. And how can putting oneself out of their loved ones’ misery be blessed? Moreover, every suicidal person is “ready to go.” If someone who is disabled or ill can be supported spiritually in having themselves made dead, why not also any other suicidal person?

The rite, which can include Communion, contains the litany to God, “We put our trust in you.” Considering the context, many Christians will find that prayer deeply ironic.

By offering the supposed imprimatur of Christ—because that is whom the church is supposed to represent as His mystical body—to being euthanized and euthanizing, the Canadian Anglican Church has further normalized killing as an answer to human suffering. Perhaps even worse, its validation could result in deaths that might have been prevented as receiving the blessing could become the tipping point for some suicidal persons choosing lethality over struggling on.

This will be of no consequence to those who are not believers. But for Christians throughout history, blessing euthanasia would be a most profound scandal.

2 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Wesley J. Smith

Wesley J. Smith is a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism and a consultant to the Patients Rights Council. In May 2004, Smith was named one of the nation’s premier thinkers in bioengineering by the National Journal because of his work in bioethics. In 2008, the Human Life Foundation named him a Great Defender of Life.

Social Share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

With Pro-Abortion Speech Law, New Jersey’s War on Women Continues  

03 Sep 2026

Surrogate Refuses to Abort Baby with Heart Defect, Saving His Life

19 Aug 2026

Entrepreneur Bryan Johnson Makes a "Clone" to Delay Death

18 Aug 2026

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher M. Reilly Clarke D. Forsythe Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Julia Duin Kathryn Jean Lopez Laura Echevarria Madeline Fry Schultz Margaret Hickey Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent The Venerable Dr. Tara Jernigan Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On X

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Follow Us On YouTube

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.