Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2024: NEW MEDIA ADDED!
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner TABLE for TEN Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 2024 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2024
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2024
    • ARCHIVE: GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

NEWSworthy

2 Comments

Abortion activist attempts to expose crisis pregnancy centers—and fails

Madeline Fry Schultz
abortion pill reversal, Mayday, pregnancy centers, Suicide and abortion
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Mayday, a pro-abortion nonprofit that pushes the abortion pill on women, sent an investigative reporter to “expose” crisis pregnancy centers of misleading pregnant women. Last month, they came forward with their findings in articles published in a number of outlets.

Olivia Raisner pretended to be pregnant and recorded employees at five crisis pregnancy centers in Indianapolis, aiming to out them for failing to help women in need.

Crisis pregnancy centers, which provide valuable resources to pregnant and postpartum women, are a favorite target of pro-abortion activists. So, to pro-life readers, it’s no surprise that Raisner’s investigation was full of exaggerated emotion, activism, and misinformation.

In an article for Ms. Magazine, Raisner claims that employees use “false and dangerous information” to dissuade women from getting abortions. What information exactly? Raisner zeroes in on two claims: 1) that women who have had abortion are more likely to commit suicide than those who do not, and 2) that medication abortion is reversable. But both of these claims are not false as Raisner posits. Let’s look closely at both.

Does abortion increase a woman’s risk of suicide?

Let’s take a look at Raisner’s first example—the idea that women are more likely to commit suicide after undergoing an abortion.

The studies on this subject are mixed, and though Raisner links to a study showing that considering confounding factors, such as the higher rate of existing mental health problems in women who choose to have abortion, making the abortion-suicide link statistically insignificant.

An older study from Finland, however, found that there was a much higher suicide rate in women who had abortions than women who were pregnant. For women of reproductive age, “the suicide rate associated with birth was 5.9 per 100,000 births and for associated abortions was 34.7 per 100,000 abortions,” meaning that when it comes to a woman’s mental health, it is much safer to bring the pregnancy to term.

Do abortion reversal pills work?

Another claim that Raisner purports to debunk is that the abortion pill is reversible. As she puts it in an article at Jezebel:

“The clinic worker featured in Mayday’s video specifically emphasized the (false) claim that if Raisner used medication abortion, she had the option to ‘reverse’ the abortion through a special pill, via a dangerous, non-proven method called ‘abortion pill reversal,’” the article reads. “Raisner told Jezebel that as medication abortion becomes more widely used, given its continued availability in all 50 states, anti-abortion activists are increasingly pushing this bogus, medically dangerous claim.”

But abortion pill reversal has actually been shown to work. The Abortion Pill Rescue Network, which has saved more than 2,000 babies through its hotline, connects women with doctors who can prescribe medication if they change their minds halfway through their abortion pill regimen. In a chemical abortion, the first abortion-inducing drug, mifepristone, inhibits progesterone and weakens the uterine lining, and the second, misoprostol, induces labor. The APRN’s research reveals is possible after taking the first pill of mifepristone, one can take a different hormonal medication to reverse its effects and turn back.

“If a woman has taken the first pill but changes her mind and decides she wants to continue with the pregnancy, she can potentially reverse the abortion process with prescription progesterone—flooding her body with ongoing doses of extra pregnancy hormones can serve as an antidote to the mifepristone’s effects,” explains Margaret Brady in a medically reviewed article for Natural Womanhood.

“One study that examined the records of more than 700 women who interrupted a medication abortion found the fetal survival rate almost doubled to 48 percent after the women were administered natural progesterone, compared to a typical fetal survival rate of roughly 25 percent after mifepristone exposure without further intervention or treatment,” Brady reports.

Misleading claims on abortion

I could go on. But one of the most patently false statements Raisner makes comes at the end of the Jezebel article. “They just want you to give birth, and they’ll say anything for that—they offered me money, gave me baby blankets, they invite the premise that they’ll be supporting me,” Raisner said of the crisis pregnancy centers. “It’s clear that that support really stops after that person gives birth.”

This claim, made without evidence, is another common criticism of pregnancy resource centers and the pro-life movement in general. But many of these centers specifically offer postpartum care and ongoing support, or actively refer women to other resources for new mothers.

Raisner and other pro-abortion activists can try to debunk pro-life claims by appealing to any information that fits their narrative, but the truth is not on their side. Mountains of scientific data continue to show that abortion ends a human life, provides physical and mental health risks to the mother, and that hormonal abortion pills can be reversed with pregnancy-hormone-supportive interventions. The truth remains on the side of life, for those with ears to hear and eyes to see.

439 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Madeline Fry Schultz

Madeline Fry Schultz is a contributing editor for Human Life Review’s NEWSworthy, an opinion editor at the Washington Examiner, and a contributing writer at Verily.

as of 10/23/2023

Social Share

  • google-share

2 Comments

  1. Pingback: The Human Life Review The Truth About Pregnancy Centers - The Human Life Review

  2. Pingback: The Human Life Review Study: Most women don’t want abortion - The Human Life Review

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

Yonkers Woman Learns Abortion is Not the ‘Quick Fix’ She Thought 

12 May 2025

RFK Jr, Autism, Eugenics--and Pro-Life Silence?

09 May 2025

IVF: The Frozen Sleep Evading Time

07 May 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.