Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2024: NEW MEDIA ADDED!
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner TABLE for TEN Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 2024 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2024
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2024
    • ARCHIVE: GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

Pastoral Reflections

0 Comment

Death and AI and Resurrection

Victor Lee Austin
a life well lived, AI, death
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

 

A teenager was murdered in a mass shooting at his school in 2018. By 2020, his parents had founded a nonprofit which, among other things, produced a political commercial. The ad opens with an introduction by the parents. Then these words appear on the screen: “We used artificial intelligence to bring [name] back for one last message.” And then the ad shows the boy, speaking: “Yo, it’s me. It’s [name].”

The AI-created teenager goes on to urge people to use their votes to curb gun violence. He notes that, were he still alive, this election would be the first he could vote in. But since his life was cut short by gun violence, he needs the viewers to vote on his behalf.

This story is recounted in “The Speech of the Dead,” an essay by Daniel Walden in the Summer 2023 issue of The New Atlantis. Walden exposes this political ad as another instance of AI crossing over a moral threshold. The dead should be allowed to rest in peace. (For this reason, I have removed the boy’s name here.) It was wrong for the Witch of Endor to summon the prophet Samuel back from the dead. Walden suggests she was a fraud, and her shock is that Samuel really appears. His reading of the Samuel story allows us to see two things: That AI, in this ad, essentially perpetrates a fraud, manipulating the boy’s image and voice to try to persuade the viewer—the persuasion being enhanced by the illusion that the boy is there, speaking. At the same time, AI proposes that we do something we should not, namely, keep alive people who have died.

But why is it, as Walden says, that “the dead must be allowed to rest”? Why is it “that their words in life must remain final”? It is natural for us to want to hang onto someone who has died. Although we must let go of their body, for it is now a corpse—“ashes to ashes, dust to dust”—we do hang onto remembrances: pictures, letters, jewelry, certain articles of clothing. To remember the dead is godly. It shows our respect for them. Yes, it can be overdone—you can hang onto too much stuff, and you can fail to go on in life to do that which God has for you to do. Still, the pious remembrance is appropriate.

Walden refers to (without naming it as such) a sermon Herbert McCabe gave on death. (It is in the book of his sermons, God, Christ, and Us, and was originally given at a Mass in Advent 1986 on BBC TV: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvWzx5eZ88E) McCabe, a Dominican priest, was a brilliant theologian of the last century, one who was able to take the thought of Thomas Aquinas and put it in understandable terms. In this sermon, McCabe says we are right to be angry with God when someone we love dies. This is implicitly different from the feelings we may have when a cat dies. Each cat, of course, is unique, thanks to its genetic inheritance and what has happened to it in life. But there is no sense in which the cat has made itself.

People, by contrast, are to some degree self-made. A teenage boy is unique in part because of his genes and in part because of what has happened to him in the world. But he is also unique because he has a hand in writing his own story. There is more to him than what nature gives. Our anger at the death of a child, a friend, or any other person we know is rooted in this “more,” this sense, as McCabe says, that “in human death nature takes back more than it has lent to us.” Death then is something of a theft. Death steals from us.

Our anger with God over this is (like everything else) first of all God’s gift to us. Just as it is God who moves us to feel gratitude for sunrise and to sorrow for our sins, so God moves us to feel anger over death. He does this because he wants us to feel the longing for resurrection. We hope that God will (in ways we cannot imagine) raise our friend from the dead as a complete human being, in body and soul. Put it this way: God has given us the longing for resurrection, but since we cannot imagine resurrection, it is natural then that this longing in us be expressed in the mode of anger.

Resurrection is not what happened at Endor when Samuel was summoned up. Resurrection is not an AI product. Resurrection is not what the titans of Silicon Valley long for when they try to extend human life to great lengths or even indefinitely. None of these is worth hoping for.

What is worth hoping for is that every human being’s story will be completed. Some of us die in our nineties, some in our fifties, some as teenagers. And—a matter very much on many of our hearts—some of us die before we are born. We have a sense that a nonagenarian meets her death with an almost-complete story, but this is not true. McCabe says that, in truth, all of us die as children. The story of an embryo that never achieves even one ounce of weight is no less complete, and in a sense, no more complete than your story as of today, whoever you are, you who read these words. The resurrection hope is for the fulfilment of what is promised in our being human, which is simply that we will one day become completely so, thus having a complete story.

 

320 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Victor Lee Austin

The Rev. Canon Victor Lee Austin, theologian-in-residence for the Episcopal Diocese of Dallas, is the author of “A Post-Covid Catechesis” and "Friendship: The Hear of Being Human."

bio current as of September 2024

Social Share

  • google-share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

RFK Jr, Autism, Eugenics--and Pro-Life Silence?

09 May 2025

IVF: The Frozen Sleep Evading Time

07 May 2025

Report: "The Abortion Pill Harms Women"

05 May 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.