Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2024: NEW MEDIA ADDED!
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner TABLE for TEN Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 2024 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2024
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2024
    • ARCHIVE: GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

BLOG

1 Comment

Tuesday: A Virulently Anti-Life Movie

Christopher M. Reilly
death, movie review
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

“Tuesday” is the title of a recent indie film (still in theaters) and the name of its main character. The unusual name recalls the day that can seem empty—lacking the energy of Monday and the celebratory release of Friday—while silently pregnant with all the stressors of the remaining work week. As a metaphor for this movie’s attitude toward human life, it is apt.

On the surface, Tuesday is a movie about death and the heroic struggle to accept its inevitability. Tuesday, the character, is a young woman who is dying, and her mother (played by Julia Louis-Dreyfus) is refusing to cope. The simultaneously unsettling and entertaining factor is that Death is personified as a giant macaw that alternates in a fascinating way between ugly, terrifying, majestic, and even compassionate personas.  This is a creative re-imagining of the angel of death, although the movie doesn’t give any clues why the writers chose the form of a talking macaw.

Also somewhat entertaining (or at least intellectually provoking) is the myth that portrays Death as the active and, one might say, purposefully driven killer of all human beings whose fated time has, for whatever reason, arrived. The viewer’s mind is filled with questions: How does the parrot actually get to every dying person, especially for simultaneous deaths? Why does the parrot seem so stressed and motivated? Why is the parrot so ugly?

Ugliness. It pervades the entire movie. Death is no happy or transcending event, nor is it ushered in by any glorious agent. There are no welcoming arms for the dead, only emptiness. The same can be said for how the film presents life, which is repeatedly equated with suffering. The parrot Death supposedly exhibits redeeming qualities by compassionately killing all human beings who are suffering as they die. The film’s message here is clear: People would not cope or be released from their suffering if not for the decisive passing of Death’s wing over their poor heads.

The ugliness extends to several nasty statements about Christianity, Christ himself, and other religions. While seeing the film could be a good learning experience for teens, they will need careful guidance: This is not simply a fanciful depiction of the drama between a mother and her dying daughter, but a movie with a dark agenda, promoting harmful ideas and destructive behavior. Tuesday celebrates euthanasia. For everyone. This is evil.

It should not be surprising, given what I have said so far, that Tuesday devolves into gratuitous violence. Never mind that its victim is the Death-parrot, and that it serves a dramatic purpose by portraying the desperation of the mother to protect her child; the violence is graphic, intense, and disturbing. It seems as if the film’s writers forgot the positive and entertaining nature of fantasy itself, struggling under the dark shroud with which they have blanketed death—and life.

Watching—and deeply reflecting on—Tuesday can be an edifying experience, as it addresses important life questions and even makes us think about the nature and purpose of filmmaking. The movie is impressive for its special effects, complex and creative story line, and very good acting. I can’t say I regret having seen it. However, without serious reflection and healing prayer, this movie will leave you as empty as a never-ending Tuesday.

179 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Christopher M. Reilly

Christopher M. Reilly lives in the greater Washington, DC region and writes and speaks about bioethics, moral theology, philosophy, and issues related to technology. He holds master’s degrees in philosophy, theology, and public affairs.

Social Share

  • google-share

One Comment

  1. Alice Lemos November 22, 2024 at 8:56 am Reply

    The Musem of the Moving Image is showing “After Tiller” with a Q and A with the director (Lana Wilson) afterwards (November 22 at 7 PM). “After Tiller” lauds the “compassionate doctors” who continue to do late term abortions for anyone at any time for any reason whatsoever. I used to have a “family membership” in the Museum, which is in Astoria, Queens. I will never renew my membership and they will never get a donation from me. They have completely gone over to the dark side.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

RFK Jr, Autism, Eugenics--and Pro-Life Silence?

09 May 2025

IVF: The Frozen Sleep Evading Time

07 May 2025

Report: "The Abortion Pill Harms Women"

05 May 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.