Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2023 pdf
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • INSISTING ON LIFE
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
    • HLF In The News
    • LIBERTY TO DO WHAT? Hadley Arkes and Rusty Reno join George McKenna June 1, 2022 in New York
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2022
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2022
    • Great Defender of Life 2022 Dinner Ticket
    • Great Defender of Life 2022 STUDENT or PREGNANCY CENTER STAFF Ticket
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2022
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Cart

BLOG

Congressional Vote This Week!
1 Comment

Congress to Vote This Week on Protection Against Discrimination

11 Jul 2016
Connie Marshner
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Take Action Now!

This week Congress is going to vote on what posterity may someday look back upon as one of the most important votes in the history of our country.

It’s called the Conscience Protection Act of 2016 (H.R.4828/S.2927).

Here’s why it’s needed urgently.

Back in the day—when we had a republican form of government—once Congress passed a bill and the President signed it into law, one knew what to expect with respect to the matters covered by the legislation.

So when the law said to government “thou shalt not,” government pretty much did not.

Not so now. Not so where abortion is involved.

In 2004, Congress passed the Weldon Amendment (part of that year’s HHS Appropriations Bill), which then-President Bush signed into law. It has been readopted by every Congress since 2005.

The Weldon Amendment provides that no HHS funds “may be made available to a federal agency or program, or to a state or local government, if such an agency, program, or government subjects any institutional or individual health care entity to discrimination on the basis that the health care entity does not provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer to abortions.”

In other words, it is the freedom of conscience law.

“Health care entity,” in the meaning of the act, includes individual nurses and doctors, hospitals, HMO’s, insurance plans, or “any other kind of health care facility, organization, or plan.”

It was meant to cover every possible healthcare application of federal funds.

Was meant to.

Today, it seems that the guarantee of freedom of conscience is not worth the paper on which it is written.

In 2014, California started violating the Weldon Amendment by forcing all health insurance plans in the state to cover any and all abortions. Religious employers in California objected, and appealed to Washington. Two years later, on June 21, HHS decided that coercion is okay in this case. Here’s Rep. Chris Smith’s June 23 press release:

WASHINGTON, June 23, 2016 /Christian Newswire/ — “Yesterday in a meeting with Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sylvia Burwell and Director of the Office of Civil Rights (OCR) Joceyln Samuels, I and my pro-life colleagues expressed our strong disagreement with the Administration’s outrageous misinterpretation of the Weldon Amendment,” said Rep. Chris Smith, Co-Chair of the Bipartisan Pro-Life Caucus.

“In a more than hour long discussion, HHS doubled down on its decision to unilaterally rewrite the law – the Weldon Amendment – to allow California to continue to discriminate against pro-life plans. California has been violating the Weldon Amendment for nearly two years with impunity – forcing churches that purchase health plans to cover abortion. It is outright discrimination to force a health plan to cease to exist because it doesn’t include abortion.”

This is discrimination against people who hold views different from HHS—discrimination against people whom Congress has clearly intended it wants to protect.

Essentially, Obama’s HHS has decided that it doesn’t like what Congress has done, so it has allowed California to continue to coerce institutions to fund abortion or lose government funding. Well, the words of any law can be interpreted in different ways, so perhaps HHS lawyers didn’t quite understand Congress’s intent.

That is why Congress is rushing to hold a vote on the Conscience Protection Act before adjournment for the political conventions.

Congress wants to make its intent even more clear.

The principle at stake is very simple: Government should not force healthcare providers to go out of business because they will not be party to an abortion. A Catholic college’s healthcare plan should not have to pay for abortion. A medical student should not have to agree to perform abortions in order to stay in medical school.

People threatened with discrimination because of conscience need a right of action to defend themselves.

That’s what the Conscience Protection Act will provide.

That’s what Congress will vote on this week.

 

Take Action Now!

Human Life Review Blog

Blog Main Page

 

465 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Connie Marshner

Connie Marshner is a commentator and researcher on life and family issues in the Washington, D.C., area.Connie Marshner bio pic 2016

Social Share

  • google-share

One Comment

  1. Pingback: The Human Life Review Recent Pro-Life Progress in the 114th Congress - The Human Life Review

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR

Recent Posts

Wyoming Bans Abortion Pills

22 Mar 2023

Legal Issues on Chemical Abortions

13 Mar 2023

HHS weighs declaring access to abortion a "public health emergency’

08 Mar 2023

CURRENT ISSUE

Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott B G Carter Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kathryn Jean Lopez Kristan Hawkins Laura Echevarria Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Meaghan Bond Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Patrick J. Flood Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro W. Ross Blackburn Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Pages

  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • TOPICS
  • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER

Follow Us On Twitter

Tweets by @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.