Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2024: NEW MEDIA ADDED!
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner TABLE for TEN Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 2024 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2024
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2024
    • ARCHIVE: GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

NEWSworthy

4 Comments

Kamala Harris Promotes Abortion Misconceptions

21 Sep 2024
Grazie Pozo Christie M.D.
hiding the truth about abortions
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

 

On the issue of abortion, which Democrats consider their great strength, Vice President Kamala Harris’ only response during the presidential debate to former President Donald Trump’s question about her comfort with abortions in the seventh, eighth, or ninth month was: “Come on!”

The moderators, who should have been the ones to ask the question, quickly changed the subject. Perhaps they are confident that the many euphemisms hiding the Democratic Party’s support for abortion without limits have successfully hoodwinked the wider public. As a physician, I believe that something as consequential as our country’s respect for the rights of vulnerable young Americans deserves both honesty and clarity.

Abortion advocates such as Harris promote three misconceptions (or purposeful obfuscations) about later-term abortion.

They just don’t happen (“Come on!”). 

According to the abortion lobby’s premier research and policy organization, the Guttmacher Institute, about 7% of all abortions in the United States in 2021 were performed on babies at 14 weeks gestation or later. While seven may sound like a small percentage, it is a large number when considering how many abortions are performed here annually. Last year alone there were tragically more than one million. Other research indicates that approximately 50,000 abortions occur after 15 weeks and about 10,000 conservatively occur at 21 weeks gestation or later.

Whatever your political leanings, that’s a lot of abortions on fully formed babies, many of them viable, many of them capable of feeling pain. That’s also a lot of mothers undergoing drawn out, traumatic, expensive, and painful procedures they will not soon forget.

Ok fine, they do happen after 20 weeks of gestation but only because of significant maternal or fetal health concerns.

This claim is widely repeated and believed, probably because most good-hearted people can’t fathom the idea that babies that developed and that active, fully formed babies they are used to seeing in high detail in ultrasounds pinned to refrigerator doors everywhere, could be electively terminated. The fact is that, according to the largest study on the subject (again from the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute), most women seek later-term abortions not because of maternal health concerns or fatal fetal disability but for non-medical reasons.

Later-term abortions are done only because of fatal fetal disability.

That’s simply not true since most later-term abortions are for non-medical reasons. However, it is a sad reflection on our modern Western culture that when a disability is detected in an unborn child using prenatal diagnosis, that child is very often terminated, even if the disability is not fatal. That’s the case with babies diagnosed with Down syndrome in utero, about 67% of whom are terminated in the United States. Babies with chromosomal differences find little tolerance and inclusivity in a society that purports to be devoted to these virtues. The problem is that in any culture where children are viewed as commodities, even minor defects are used to justify termination. Increasingly popular prenatal screenings also lead to the elimination of healthy infants because they so often result in false positives.

Whichever way one counts later-term abortions, tens of thousands of elective later-term abortions are performed each year. Harris and her party should take these numbers as seriously as the 2,590 children who lost their lives to gun violence in 2021. They might then hit upon the right attitude and the proper outrage. Surely, those unborn children merit our concern and our notice.

 

 

912 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
Grazie Pozo Christie M.D.

Grazie Pozo Christie, M.D., is a senior fellow for the Catholic Association and host of the nationally syndicated radio show Conversations with Consequences.

Social Share

  • google-share

4 Comments

  1. Vivianne Hoskinson September 30, 2024 at 11:29 am Reply

    Thank you Dr.Chrustie. I believe this is the single most important issue defining the candidate Kamala Harris.

    I believe this is the single most important issue to confront the voters this year. There are others, but upon this one rides the future of humanity. Will we be a people who reject life: young, old, and disabled? Or will we be a culture that embraces life as sacred, given by God, which no one has a right to terminate?

  2. Mark September 30, 2024 at 12:37 pm Reply

    Well said, Dr. Christie.
    It helped me understand better. Have you sent this to the actual Harris campaign? I pray for your protection and success.

    Thanks.
    Peace and goodness to you,
    Mark Lindeblad

  3. Pingback: The Human Life Review Melania Trump comes out as pro-abortion - The Human Life Review

  4. Pingback: The Human Life Review Kamala Harris Rejects Religious Exemptions for Pro-Lifers - The Human Life Review

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

RFK Jr, Autism, Eugenics--and Pro-Life Silence?

09 May 2025

IVF: The Frozen Sleep Evading Time

07 May 2025

Report: "The Abortion Pill Harms Women"

05 May 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.