Our Malignant Normality
The majority of people don’t have to go all in for evil for a society to turn to evil. They need only go one-third or half-way. That’s one lesson to be taken from the work of the psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton, most famous as the author of The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide.
The book appeared in 1986 and was widely praised. Lifton has just written a new preface to the latest edition, part of which appeared in the leftist magazine Dissent (https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/malignant-normality-doctors). I used his insights to talk about lessons for our cultural trust in doctors here https://aleteia.org/2017/06/14/do-not-put-your-trust-in-doctors/. Doctors are the princeliest of our princes, but as the psalmist said, “Put not your trust in princes.”
What I want to point to now is Lifton’s insight into the way average people—most of us—drift or slide or shuffle or stumble into moral corruption. We are socialized into what Lifton calls “malignant normality.” Evil ideologies shape our thinking even when we think we’re resisting them.
The Nazi’s Malignant Normality
Hitler, says Lifton, preached “a genocidal ideology” that offered
what I call a biomedical vision as a kind of explanation of history: namely, that the Nordic race had once been healthy and dominant as the only culture-creating race; that it became “infected” by destructive Jewish influence and rendered weak and ill; and that it could become healthy and strong again only by ridding it of that Jewish influence.
Taken seriously by enough people, it created the “Nazi normality” and led to the murder of six million Jews, and millions of others. We look at the rise of Hitler and Nazism and wonder how stupid these people could have been. We certainly wouldn’t believe anything at once so silly and so evil.
Maybe not. (Though maybe we would, who really knows? When you think you stand, take care lest you fall, as one shrewd observer of human weakness said.) Apparently relatively few people in Nazi Germany actually believed the whole Hitlerian thing. They didn’t need to, to do what the committed Nazis wanted them to do.
Lifton writes of the Nazi doctors: “Significantly, very few Nazi doctors believed fully in that ideological vision.” Most, he said, held
to little more than the existence of a “Jewish problem” that somehow had to be “solved.” Extreme ideologues do much to create a malignant normality, which comes to pervade most institutions, including medical ones. Then ordinary people who work in those institutions adhere to that normality, often aided by bits and pieces of the extreme ideology. The prevailing normality can be decisive because it excludes alternatives and provides strong pressures for destructive behavior.
That’s the revealing and the scary insight. The average person only needs to hold a milder, diluted form of the ideology. He can feel himself the reasonable one and even feel that he’s on the other side of the matter from the ideologue. And still wind up doing the horrible thing the ideologue wants him to. Because social elites and so many of his peers believe the same thing, he does not see how warped his vision of things has become. He accepts the malignant normality as normality. It’s the way things are. Everyone knows that. So he thinks.
In Our Own History
We can find that happening in our country’s history and perhaps in our own lives. In my New England-college-town youth, I met people who were horrified by outright racism who still spoke as racists.
They’d deny that black people were inferior to white people. They’d denounce Southern racists. But they’d say that black people and white people are “different.” Not intrinsically, but for historical and cultural reasons. And from that idea they somehow got to the idea that segregation, and the inferior facilities it brought about, were normal and for the moment probably inevitable. They’d propose desegregation as a goal for the future. Or they’d demand immediate desegregation in the South but refuse even to discuss desegregating the North.
When we visited friends in the South, I’d hear people talk that way, but even more bluntly. The racists who got on television embarrassed them. They resented the way those people presented the South to the rest of the world. Yet their conversation would eventually wind up with almost the same conclusions. They might prefer to blame the media or argue that the North was just as segregated as the South, rather than speak directly about black people. They still defended segregation as natural.
The process Lifton describes helps explain why so many of our peers, and even our friends and allies, are so bewilderingly indifferent to the open killing of unborn human beings. We have the ideologues and profiteers whose support for abortion is absolute. But even more people support it in general or vaguely. They prefer the language of hard choices and tragic necessities, of a woman and her doctor. They may even speak of abortion as “safe, legal, and rare.” Those are the equivalents of “the Jewish problem” and “black people are different.”
They can’t conceive of a world without legal abortion. On this matter, at least, they live in a world of malignant normality.
Truth but there are clear differences in the races. Just like the differences in dog breeds.
So what is your point? Do you think you are superior to your fellow human being? What is really your point?
Fair enough although political correctness will forwn on this. Thanks
Wow they deleted your comment already!! What a bunch of BS.
ADMIN NOTE: The comment or comments above were never deleted. Approval of the editor is needed before comments can be posted.Therefore there was a delay before they appeared. We approve a wide variety of comments in order to provide fair expression of different points of view.
That being said, the Human Life Review does not equate differences in human races with differences in dog breeds, and can see how such a statement may be offensive to many.
I think to ignore the differences between peoples is just as racist as saying some are inferior. There are distinct differences between peoples (just as there are between the sexes) that are clearly evident by the way we look and act. This can be seen as a negative or a positive. One can choose to look at the negatives or the positives. I do think that, culturally speaking, some cultures are superior to others in that they have fostered better traits/behaviors and encourage what is good for society as a whole while other cultures foster behaviors that are not good for society at large. I know I will be hit hard for this but to be so pc as to not point out the obvious is not honest. Its like saying men and women are the same. They are not, they have different gifts and talents. That doesn’t mean one is better or worse. They are the same in dignity as humans but have different skills to offer. Now, I also would like to point out that people are not defined by the culture in which they live. Some who are brought up in the cultures with lesser moral standards can rise to the highest heights. But as a group, many are held back by the limitations set on them by the culture into which they have been indoctrinated. As individuals, they can break free of those limitations and become what God has created them to be but that is a hard road to travel which usually results in rejection by the group with which one identifies.
A sad truth of humanity, especially if it really doesn’t affect your life; you’re able to stay on the fringes of the atrocity. All choices require an assumption of responsibility of the consequences of your choice, the intended and unintended. That is why, when it comes to human life there can be no choice but to choose life. Otherwise you may be held accountable for the unintended consequences of your intentional ignorance. That is also why we must pray for the forgiveness of the times we lacked courage and especially for the times when others did.
I have studied political philosophy and personhood at post graduate level. Racism is a scientific fact. Now, there is no such thing as the ‘black’ race or any other of the races as bigots imagine. But the identity of any/every individual is in part created by the culture (and indeed, the sub-culture) that this individual inhabits. Therefore there is the American ‘race’ and in America there are significant sub-cultures, often significantly orientated around skin colour. But genuine ‘races’ can involve a multitude of factors.
All humans are made in the image of God, yes. Incidentals like skin colour are just that, incidental. Like eye colour and hair colour and texture. Of course. However the saying “different countries have different customs” is a fact. Everyone has a conception of what is normal and this is significantly socially constructed. Only God knows what is normal in absolute terms; all humans can only approximate this through the lens of his/her particular culture.
I once horrified a young American woman when I remarked that I once voted for a Communist Party candidate. She nearly lost her life and we explained about the Single Transferable Vote and how a protest vote is not a wasted vote. As the conversation continued she ‘freaked’ when she learned that the Labour Party (a partner in government at the time) was a socialist party.
No offence meant here but…
RE: Our Malignant Normality 20 JUN 2017 by DAVID MILLS. Clear, critical thinking on the subject of racism, thank you, Mr. Mills. Next, please write on the malignancy of sexism: “The exclusively male image of God is not applicable to the children of God. were that the case, the Virgin Mary would not “have won God’s favor and thus become Theotokos, the Mother of God.” (p. 17, Mary the Unwed Mother of God, by Gonzalo T. Palacios, PhD, Xulon Press, June 2017)
Pingback: FRIDAY AFTERNOON SÆCVLARIA EDITION | Big Pulpit
Pingback: What is malignant normality and why should you care? Diane Bederman | RUTHFULLY YOURS
Pingback: What is malignant normality and why should you care? - Diane Bederman- Your Passionate Voice of Reason What is malignant normality and why should you care? Well, I agree that a malignant normality is taking place in America, not from a narcissistic leader