Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2023
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • INSISTING ON LIFE
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
    • HLF In The News
    • LIBERTY TO DO WHAT? Hadley Arkes and Rusty Reno join George McKenna June 1, 2022 in New York
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2022
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2022
    • Great Defender of Life 2022 Dinner Ticket
    • Great Defender of Life 2022 STUDENT or PREGNANCY CENTER STAFF Ticket
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2022
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Cart

BLOG

2 Comments

The Abortionist Willie Parker, a Moral Man

18 Apr 2017
David Mills
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

His becoming an abortionist, Willie Parker tells Rolling Stone, “was an assertion of my responsibility to pursue justice and human dignity.” I don’t doubt him. He is, by his lights, a moral man.

Parker heads the board of Physicians for Reproductive Health and performs abortions at the one abortion facility left in Mississippi. He’s a biggie in the abortion industry. Planned Parenthood gave him their 2015 Margaret Sanger Award. He’s just published Life’s Work: A Moral Argument for Choice. Hence the Rolling Stone interview (http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/willie-parker-taking-back-the-moral-high-ground-on-abortion-w475403).

The Purest Positions

Parker takes every position you’d expect an abortionist to take, and he takes them in the purest form. The state should impose no restrictions on any abortion, ever. It should fund them and make others (employers, insurance companies) fund them too.

Neil Gorsuch “is not fit to serve on the Supreme Court if he won’t support women’s constitutional rights to abortion,” Parker said in a recent PRH press release https://prh.org/gorsuch/ . “Any prospective Supreme Court nominee must uphold this settled law about a woman’s ability to make her own reproductive health decisions.”

He also objected that the nominee had read the law in favor of Hobby Lobby and the Little Sisters of the Poor. Doing that “undermin[ed] health care access for women” and denied “an employee’s right to health insurance that meets all of her health care needs.” Opposing legal abortion is “placing politics over medicine.”

In another press release https://prh.org/statement-confirmation-jeff-sessions-attorney-general/ , Parker opposed the nomination of Jeff Sessions as Attorney General because opposing abortion “is unacceptable for any officeholder.” Everyone in office must “protect the constitutional right to abortion.”

For Parker, the right to legal and affordable abortion isn’t just settled law but an act of moral maturity. In the interview, he invokes Martin Luther King, Jr., as being “instrumental in me examining my role in addressing injustice and oppression.” He talks about finding “a deeper humanity” when he began to do abortions. He then became “more willing to be defined by how I respond to injustice than about accommodating customs and norms that are rooted in injustice.”

In the rest of the interview, he speaks as if legal, fully affordable abortion is not just good but morally imperative. Women who can’t get abortions are like slaves in the Old South. He’s indignant about women’s subservience to the “patriarchy.” Without making any kind of argument, he suggests that their liberation requires legal abortion. “The closest thing I could think of that would be analogous to women not being in control of their reproductive rights,” he says, “would be the horrible legacy of slavery we have in this country.”

The interview closes with Parker describing pro-lifers as heartless. We’re concerned not for the unborn and their mothers but want to drag America back several decades. We don’t have the same moral concern for women that he does. Ours is really a political cause. “It just makes sense to me,” he says,

that the people opposed to abortion are really interested in controlling the fertility of white women. Because white women are the ones who are working outside the home and defying conventional nuclear family concepts. They’ve been able to do that by gaining control over their fertility.

A Moral Argument

As I said at the beginning, I don’t doubt that for Parker performing abortions expresses his “responsibility to pursue justice and human dignity.” He may justifiably, from his point of view, see himself as continuing King’s work of liberation. I’m sure he believes that he’s helping a woman every time he kills her baby and that he’s making the world better by defending abortion the way he does.

Anyone can make a moral argument for the most extreme practice of abortion, and Parker does. You can make the argument from a sincere compassion for the women pregnant with babies they don’t want. You can invoke the classic visions of liberation and freedom to explain what you do.

You can do all this, easily, with a clean conscience, if you make one small adjustment at the beginning. Just deny that the unborn boy or girl shares your humanity, and you can speak for killing them as if it were a moral necessity. Make one deeply immoral choice and you establish a new morality. The question never raised in the interview, by Rolling Stone or Parker, is who and what the child is.

The child is never mentioned at all. He doesn’t matter. He’s invisible. Just a thing for other people to dispose of as they wish. What happens when a society denies the humanity of its most vulnerable citizens is the lesson of slavery that Willie Parker doesn’t think to draw.

 

 

1,551 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
David Mills

David Mills, former editor of Touchstone and First Things, is a columnist for OSV, the National Catholic Register, and other Catholic publications.

MORE from David Mills Here

Social Share

  • google-share

2 Comments

  1. Brian D Kelly April 21, 2017 at 1:23 pm Reply

    Yes, Mr. Mills. Exactly. Pro-aborts refuse to define the terms. What is a “fetus”? The word had always meant (from Latin) “a preborn baby.” Not a “thing” but a person, “a baby in the womb.” Some who are pro-abortion, like feminist Camille Paglia, are critical of those pro-choicers who are reluctant to admit that they are “killing a human person.” Abortionist, Dr. Curtis Boyd, even boasted when asked about his practice: “Am I Killing? Yes, I am. I Know That”

  2. David Thomas April 23, 2017 at 8:26 pm Reply

    The Word is not “abortion” …The Word is Slaughter a Person

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR

Recent Posts

Legal Issues on Chemical Abortions

13 Mar 2023

HHS weighs declaring access to abortion a "public health emergency’

08 Mar 2023

Rihanna’s Super Bowl pregnancy announcement is an unexpected pro-life moment

15 Feb 2023

CURRENT ISSUE

Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott B G Carter Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kathryn Jean Lopez Kristan Hawkins Laura Echevarria Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Meaghan Bond Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Patrick J. Flood Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro W. Ross Blackburn Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Pages

  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • TOPICS
  • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER

Follow Us On Twitter

Tweets by @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.