Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Winter 2025 PDF
    • WINTER 2025 HTML
    • THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW HTML COLLECTION PAGE
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2024: NEW MEDIA ADDED!
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 50th Anniversary Dinner TABLE for TEN Ticket 2024
    • Great Defender of Life 2024 Young Adult / Pregnancy Center Staffer Tickets
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2024
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2024
    • ARCHIVE: GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2023
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
    • ISSUES IN HTML FORMAT
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Your Cart: Shipping is ALWAYS Free!

Pastoral Reflections

1 Comment

Receiving as Persons Those Deemed Non-Persons

23 Sep 2024
David Poecking
fetal personhood, Jesus and children
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

 

I wish to remind Christians that acknowledging the humanity of the unborn child is at the heart of what it means to follow Jesus.

In the Roman Lectionary for Sunday, September 22, 2024, we encounter what could serve as the signature pro-life passage of the New Testament:

Taking a child, he [Jesus] placed it in their midst, and putting his arms around it, he said to them, “Whoever receives one child such as this in my name, receives me; and whoever receives me, receives not me but the One who sent me.”

—Mark 9:36-37

Scholarly commentators hasten to point out that in the ancient world people did not project onto children our contemporary romantic notions of innocence or purity. On the contrary, children born to common families were unworthy of the attention of adult males. In the social hierarchy against which men measured themselves, children were non-persons, much like most women and slaves.

So Jesus is not recommending what we might today call childlike innocence or simplicity. Instead, he calls his disciples to recognize those not deemed worthy of recognition, including the child Jesus puts before them. To “receive”—that is, to acknowledge and welcome—a child is tantamount to receiving Jesus himself, and the Father who sent him.

Jesus’ exhortation follows an episode in which his disciples had been arguing as to who was the greatest among them. By this they did not mean the tallest man or the foremost preacher or some other competitive achievement not linked to moral value. Such competition, while frivolous, might still be tolerable. Sadly, “greatest” in this context meant “most valuable,” “very important”—more of a person and more worthy of acknowledgment than the others.

Worse yet, the disciples’ argument follows on Jesus’ ongoing instruction concerning what it means for him to be the awaited Messiah. Jesus has been explaining that unlike his ancestor David, he will not straightaway mount a throne and command armies; rather, he will be handed over to wicked men and they will kill him.

When Jesus challenges the disciples about their conversation, they are silent. Presumably they intuit that their desire for worldly recognition goes against what he has taught them about messiahship. Insisting the child be received in his name, Jesus confirms that they are in error. “If anyone wishes to be first,” Jesus continues, “he shall be the last of all and the servant of all.” To be the greatest in Jesus’ estimation does not mean trying to be the Most Important Person but rather going out of one’s way to affirm the personhood of others, even those deemed non-persons, such as the child Jesus embraces.

The recognition of the humanity of the unborn child is perhaps the perfect distillation of Jesus’ gesture. Prolifers might take encouragement from Jesus: Not only because their movement is dedicated to receiving those deemed non-persons, but also because Jesus understands the receiving of the child as something akin to his own mission to save the world via submission to men and death on a cross.

Of course, the unborn child may not be the only “non-person” in the scenarios confronting prolifers. The woman considering abortion feels her dignity is threatened by those who will judge her motherhood. The child’s father, and even those promoting or facilitating an abortion, can also be perceived as unworthy of recognition. The pro-life movement is dedicated to recognizing and protecting the unborn child, but the Christian calling is to recognize and affirm the personhood of all—especially, but not exclusively. the child.

So let Christians remember that to receive the unborn child is to receive Jesus, and that the habit of affirming the dignity and value of other persons is at the heart of Our Lord’s saving work.

219 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
David Poecking

Fr. David Poecking is the regional vicar of the South Vicariate of the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh.

More by Father Poecking

 

 

Social Share

  • google-share

One Comment

  1. Mary Stevens September 23, 2024 at 10:31 pm Reply

    As always, a very thoughtful and well crafted explanation of the Christian underpinnings for the pro-life stance. Also a call to recognize the dignity and inherent value of all God’s children. We dare not limit the scope of our love for others to one segment of the human family. A challenging task for us all.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR
The-Human-Life-Foundation
DONATE TODAY!

Recent Posts

IVF: The Frozen Sleep Evading Time

07 May 2025

Report: "The Abortion Pill Harms Women"

05 May 2025

New York Pushes Asissted Suicide

30 Apr 2025

CURRENT ISSUE

Alexandra DeSanctis Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott Bernadette Patel Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke D. Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Helen Alvaré Jacqueline O’Hara Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kristan Hawkins Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Marvin Olasky Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Matt Lamb Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Rev. W. Ross Blackburn Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro Wesley J. Smith William Murchison

Shop 7 Weeks Coffee--the Pro-Life Coffee Company!
Support 7 Weeks Coffee AND the Human Life Foundation!
  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • Annual Human Life Foundation Dinner

Follow Us On Twitter

Follow @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.