Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • CURRENT
    • Spring 2022 PDF
    • Spring 2022 Articles
    • NEWSworthy: What’s Happening and What It Means to You
    • Blog
    • INSISTING ON LIFE
    • Pastoral Reflections
    • About Us
    • HLF In The News
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2021
    • Great Defender of Life 2021 Dinner Ticket
    • SPONSOR a TABLE at the Great Defender of Life 2021 Dinner
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2021
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2021
  • ARCHIVE
    • Archive Spotlight
  • LEGACY
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • SHOP
    • Cart

BLOG

1 Comment

“There are no fetal rights!”

10 Apr 2015
Vincenzina Santoro
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

It is well known in the pro-life movement that the pro-choice/anti-life lobby at the United Nations has been advocating for sexual and reproductive health and rights for many years. The organizations that promote this agenda behave like termites, working to erode and demolish abortion restrictions in any and all countries in order to accomplish their ultimate goal of “abortion on request”—as the UN labels abortion on demand.

Those who see life as inviolable from conception to natural death uphold the “right to life,” words that are enshrined in Article 3 of the UN’s own Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.” The “other side” interprets the Charter as not applying to the unborn. The former head of the UN Human Rights Council once told me that “a person is not a person until he or she is born.”

Last month, in a panel discussion on women’s rights and faith considerations during the Commission on the Status of Women, the representative of a British non-governmental organization (NGO)  uttered a stunning response to a question concerning the innocence of the unborn and abortion. She stated unequivocally and loudly: “There are no fetal rights!”

Such a statement may represent one of the few times ever that an attempt has been made at the UN to negate a right. The gestation period of a human being is assigned to a sort of secular limbo in this novel manner of advocating for the ultimate in reproductive rights.

The defense-of-life argument has shifted to a somewhat different and more difficult tack. Merely wanting to protect the unborn may no longer suffice. The pro-life movement has to confront the challenge of a presumed absence of the pre-born human being’s right to make it to its birthday.

This UN encounter took place at an event discussing the intersecting issues of faith, norms, human rights, and women’s empowerment, and the potential role religious leaders play in helping to change people’s beliefs and traditions. The panelists themselves acknowledged that “conservative religious leaders were listened to” by faith adherents so it was essential to win them over to their cause.

Moreover, they acknowledged that faith-based organizations are significant providers of health- care services around the globe, and that they would dearly love to be able to capture such an extensive distribution system for their own “products and services.” Alas for them, the vast majority of healthcare, especially in poor countries, is provided by innumerable Catholic institutions whose leaders adhere to “Thou shalt not kill,” a mandate that does apply to the fetal stage.

*     *     *     *     *

Vincenzina Santoro is an international economist. She represents the American Family Association of New York at the United Nations.

345 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.

Social Share

  • google-share

One Comment

  1. Patty Knap April 10, 2015 at 1:24 pm Reply

    It’s so exasperating even trying to talk to pro aborts. They want to separate ‘fetal rights’ from basic human rights.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Comments will not be posted until approved by a moderator in an effort to prevent spam and off-topic responses.

*
*

captcha *

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR

Recent Posts

Now Politicians Are Attacking Pregnancy Resource Centers, Too

01 Jul 2022

ROE OVERTURNED

24 Jun 2022

Amid Possibility of ‘Roe’ Overturning, Pro-life Centers Face Threats and Attacks

15 Jun 2022

CURRENT ISSUE

Anne Conlon Anne Hendershott B G Carter Brian Caulfield Christopher White Clarke Forsythe Colleen O’Hara Connie Marshner David Mills David Poecking David Quinn Diane Moriarty Dr. Donald DeMarco Edward Mechmann Edward Short Ellen Wilson Fielding Fr. Gerald E. Murray George McKenna Jane Sarah Jason Morgan Joe Bissonnette John Grondelski Kathryn Jean Lopez Kristan Hawkins Laura Echevarria Madeline Fry Schultz Maria McFadden Maffucci Mary Meehan Mary Rose Somarriba Meaghan Bond Nat Hentoff Nicholas Frankovich Patrick J. Flood Peter Pavia Rev. George G. Brooks Rev. Paul T. Stallsworth Stephen Vincent Tara Jernigan Ursula Hennessey Victor Lee Austin Vincenzina Santoro W. Ross Blackburn Wesley J. Smith William Doino Jr. William Murchison

Pages

  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • TOPICS

Follow Us On Twitter

Tweets by @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) The Human Life Foundation.